These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20357683)

  • 21. Compensating victims of occupational lung disease: the physician's role in the system.
    Richman SI
    J Occup Med; 1989 Apr; 31(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 2523961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re: Lawson IJ, McGeoch KL. A medical assessment process for a large volume of medico-legal compensation claims for hand-arm vibration syndrome.
    Archibald R
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Jan; 54(1):59. PubMed ID: 14963258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The admissibility of behavioral science evidence in the courtroom: the translation of legal to scientific concepts and back.
    Faust D; Grimm PW; Ahern DC; Sokolik M
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2010; 6():49-77. PubMed ID: 17716029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008.
    Svider PF; Husain Q; Kovalerchik O; Mauro AC; Setzen M; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 23332297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The interdependence of science and law.
    Breyer S
    Science; 1998 Apr; 280(5363):537-8. PubMed ID: 9575098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Case for the establishment of a code of ethics to govern the frivolous use of forensic biomechanical testimony to resolve legal issues involving alleged work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
    Schneck DJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2007; 17(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 19267689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hypothetical constructs, hypothetical questions, and the expert witness.
    Brodsky SL; Titcomb C; Sams DM; Dickson K; Benda Y
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):354-61. PubMed ID: 23031651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orthopaedic expert opinion, testimony, and the physician as a defendant.
    Carroll C; Wellman DS
    Instr Course Lect; 2011; 60():597-605. PubMed ID: 21553802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Litigation, regulation, and education--protecting the public's health through childhood immunization.
    Silverman RD
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Jun; 360(24):2500-1. PubMed ID: 19516031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The four most pernicious myths in asbestos litigation: Part I: safe chrysotile and idiopathic mesothelioma.
    Meisenkothen C
    New Solut; 2014; 24(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 25053604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. End the blame and shame game. Health courts one way to compensate injured patients and promote safety.
    Barringer P; Dauer E
    Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(21):36. PubMed ID: 17824188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Health courts.
    Kopen DF
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Aug; 91(8):48. PubMed ID: 18557074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical practice guidelines in courts' representation of medical evidence and testimony.
    Taipale J; Hautamäki L
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Apr; 275():113805. PubMed ID: 33721744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Trial helplessness of defendant healthcare facilities in cases concerning nosocomial infections].
    Drzewiecki A; Chowaniec C; Wajda-Drzewiecka K; Skowronek R
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2013; 63(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 24847642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Expert scientific evidence in the Israeli court.
    Sahar A
    Med Law; 2007 Jun; 26(2):257-82. PubMed ID: 17639850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neuropsychologists diagnose traumatic brain injury.
    Wade JB; DeMatteo D; Hart RP
    Brain Inj; 2004 Jul; 18(7):629-43. PubMed ID: 15204325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The trials and tribulations of two historians: adjudicating responsibility for pollution and personal harm.
    Rosner D; Markowitz G
    Med Hist; 2009 Apr; 53(2):271-92. PubMed ID: 19367349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.