These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20358443)

  • 1. Multiple comparisons of repeatedly measured response: issues of validation testing in thorough QT/QTc clinical trials.
    Tsong Y; Yan LK; Zhong J; Nie L; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):654-64. PubMed ID: 20358443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple comparisons of repeated measured response: issues of assessment of prolongation of QT interval in thorough QT trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhong J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 20358439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exposure-response modeling approach for assessing QT effect in "thorough" QT/QTc studies.
    Hosmane B; Locke C; Chiu YL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):615-31. PubMed ID: 20358440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation testing in thorough QT/QTc clinical trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhong J; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):529-41. PubMed ID: 18470761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical consideration in testing for assay sensitivity in a "thorough" QT study.
    Sethuraman V; Wu S; Wang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):641-53. PubMed ID: 20358442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size calculation for thorough QT/QTc study considering various factors related to multiple time points.
    Meng Z; Kringle R; Chen X; Zhao PL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):563-77. PubMed ID: 20358436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size and power estimation in "thorough" QT/QTc studies with parallel group design.
    Hosmane B; Locke C; Chiu YL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):578-86. PubMed ID: 20358437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical characteristics of moxifloxacin-induced QTc effect.
    Yan LK; Zhang J; Ng MJ; Dang Q
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 20358432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for positive control activity in a thorough QTc study.
    Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):517-28. PubMed ID: 18470760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of several methods for analyzing data from thorough QT studies.
    Tian H; Qiao W; Natarajan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):632-40. PubMed ID: 20358441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further discussion on the design and analysis of thorough QTc clinical trials: guest editors' notes.
    Tsong Y; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):493-6. PubMed ID: 20358431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical characterization of QT prolongation.
    Schall R; Ring A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):543-62. PubMed ID: 20358435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the average baseline versus the time-matched baseline in parallel group thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Meng Z; Quan H; Fan L; Kringle R; Sun G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):665-82. PubMed ID: 20358444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisit the combination validation test of Tsong et al. for thorough QT/QTc clinical trials.
    Sun GG; Quan H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):683-7; author reply 688. PubMed ID: 20358445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size calculations for crossover thorough QT studies: satisfaction of regulatory threshold and assay sensitivity.
    Anand SP; Murray SC; Koch GG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):587-603. PubMed ID: 20358438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian measurement error approach to QT interval correction and prolongation.
    Chen J; Zhao X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):523-42. PubMed ID: 20358434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical issues of QT prolongation assessment based on linear concentration modeling.
    Tsong Y; Shen M; Zhong J; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):564-84. PubMed ID: 18470764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical issues including design and sample size calculation in thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Zhang J; Machado SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):451-67. PubMed ID: 18470755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size of thorough QTc clinical trial adjusted for multiple comparisons.
    Tsong Y; Sun A; Kang SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 23331221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.