BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20359427)

  • 1. Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An
    Al Ghwainem A; Alqarni AS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 38514432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Fiber-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations Immersed in Three Different Beverages:
    George MA; Chandak SA; Khekade SH; Gahlod NB; Wasnik MB; V SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 38956850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART) Restorations Using Silver Diammine Fluoride and High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer.
    Powell JD; Acosta C; Wells MH; Morrow BR; Vinall CV; Garcia-Godoy F
    Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 46(3):204-208. PubMed ID: 38822497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of protective coating agents on microleakage and flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer. an in vitro study.
    Thomas HA; Singh N; Thomas AM; Masih S; Cherian JM; Varghese KG
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 37991624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative and qualitative investigation into the management of carious primary molars by foundation dentists in primary care in the South East of England.
    Buontempo Z; Ashley P; Almaeen S
    Br Dent J; 2024 Apr; 236(8):625-629. PubMed ID: 38671121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between clinical and digital images with various resolutions to evaluate glass ionomer cement restoration on primary teeth.
    Lastyautari I; Fahlevi Rizal M; Fauziah E
    Saudi Dent J; 2024 May; 36(5):804-809. PubMed ID: 38766284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anxiety Levels among Five-Year-Old Children Undergoing ART Restoration- A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Ishan ; Shivlingesh KK; Agarwal V; Gupta BD; Anand R; Sharma A; Kushwaha S; Khan K
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC45-ZC48. PubMed ID: 28571260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of acid etching on bond strength of nanoionomer as an orthodontic bonding adhesive.
    Khan S; Verma SK; Maheshwari S
    J Orthod Sci; 2015; 4(4):113-7. PubMed ID: 26955629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study.
    Mathew SM; Thomas AM; Koshy G; Dua K
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013 Jan; 6(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25206179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of nano-particle-filled resin-modified glass ionomer using atraumatic restorative technique in primary molars.
    Wadenya R; Smith J; Mante F
    N Y State Dent J; 2010; 76(4):36-9. PubMed ID: 20863039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do glass ionomer cements prevent caries lesions in margins of restorations in primary teeth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Raggio DP; Tedesco TK; Calvo AF; Braga MM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Mar; 147(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 26581769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.
    Mickenautsch S; Tyas MJ; Yengopal V; Oliveira LB; Bönecker M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Sep; 18(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 21077424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
    Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
    Wadenya R; Mante FK
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.