These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20359959)

  • 1. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
    Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
    Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
    Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
    Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
    De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition.
    Wills BP; Auerbach JD; Zhu X; Caird MS; Horn BD; Flynn JM; Drummond DS; Dormans JP; Ecker ML
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine.
    Cheung J; Wever DJ; Veldhuizen AG; Klein JP; Verdonck B; Nijlunsing R; Cool JC; Van Horn JR
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 12522710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
    Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
    Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
    Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
    Kuklo TR; Potter BK; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG; Polly DW;
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Apr; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 15800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis.
    Aubin CE; Bellefleur C; Joncas J; de Lanauze D; Kadoury S; Blanke K; Parent S; Labelle H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(12):E780-90. PubMed ID: 21224755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
    Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-generated index for evaluation of idiopathic scoliosis in digital chest images: a comparison with digital measurement.
    Tang FH; Chan LW; Lau HP; Tsui PY; Cheung CW
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Oct; 21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S113-20. PubMed ID: 17680309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
    Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs.
    Ricart PA; Andres TM; Apazidis A; Errico TJ; Trobisch PD
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):942-6. PubMed ID: 22005079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
    Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computerized method for evaluating scoliotic deformities using elliptical pattern recognition in X-ray spine images.
    Pinheiro AP; Coelho JC; Veiga ACP; Vrtovec T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():85-92. PubMed ID: 29852970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.
    Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.