These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20359959)
21. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validity and reliability of a computer method to estimate vertebral axial rotation from digital radiographs. Pinheiro AP; Tanure MC; Oliveira AS Eur Spine J; 2010 Mar; 19(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 19820970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method. Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of Vertebral Curves Using the Manual Post-It Technique. Gladnick BP; Schreiber JJ; Ishmael CR; Bjerke-Kroll BT; Cunningham ME Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):E148-E151. PubMed ID: 28323693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer-assisted radiographic calculation of spinal curvature in brachycephalic "screw-tailed" dog breeds with congenital thoracic vertebral malformations: reliability and clinical evaluation. Guevar J; Penderis J; Faller K; Yeamans C; Stalin C; Gutierrez-Quintana R PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106957. PubMed ID: 25198374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An integrative framework for 3D cobb angle measurement on CT images. Huo X; Tan JQ; Qian J; Cheng L; Jing JH; Shao K; Li BN Comput Biol Med; 2017 Mar; 82():111-118. PubMed ID: 28183004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiographic measurement error of the scoliotic curve angle depending on positioning of the patient and the side of scoliotic curve. Schmid SL; Buck FM; Böni T; Farshad M Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 26423748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of digital radiographs for pediatric lower extremity alignment. Nowicki PD; Vanderhave KL; Farley FA; Kuhns LR; Dahl W; Caird MS J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):631-5. PubMed ID: 22892628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Raster stereography versus radiography in the long-term follow-up of idiopathic scoliosis. Schulte TL; Hierholzer E; Boerke A; Lerner T; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V; Hackenberg L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18418132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Cobb Angle-Vertebral Rotation Angle-Spinous Process Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Chan AC; Morrison DG; Nguyen DV; Hill DL; Parent E; Lou EH Spine Deform; 2014 May; 2(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 27927414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb's method, by Ferguson's method and by a new method. Diab KM; Sevastik JA; Hedlund R; Suliman IA Eur Spine J; 1995; 4(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 8581530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between constrained and non-constrained Cobb techniques for the assessment of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Mac-Thiong JM; Pinel-Giroux FM; de Guise JA; Labelle H Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17426991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images. Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Dansereau J; Labelle H J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 17414987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prestigiacomo FG; Hulsbosch MHHM; Bruls VEJ; Nieuwenhuis JJ Spine Deform; 2022 Jan; 10(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 34383285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of conventional full spine radiographs and fluoroscopic scanning method in young patients with idiopathic scoliosis]. Schaefer J; Kluba T; Niemeyer T; Hahnfeldt T; Vonthein R; Kottke R; Kamm KF; Claussen C Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16021543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]