These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20359960)

  • 1. Cost and use of conservative management of lumbar disc herniation before surgical discectomy.
    Daffner SD; Hymanson HJ; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 20359960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis.
    Ambrossi GL; McGirt MJ; Sciubba DM; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Long DM
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Sep; 65(3):574-8; discussion 578. PubMed ID: 19687703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy.
    Sherman J; Cauthen J; Schoenberg D; Burns M; Reaven NL; Griffith SL
    Spine J; 2010 Feb; 10(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 19819761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon.
    Katayama Y; Matsuyama Y; Yoshihara H; Sakai Y; Nakamura H; Nakashima S; Ito Z; Ishiguro N
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jul; 19(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 16826006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid- to long-term outcome of disc excision in adolescent disc herniation.
    Smorgick Y; Floman Y; Millgram MA; Anekstein Y; Pekarsky I; Mirovsky Y
    Spine J; 2006; 6(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 16825042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy: outcome of repeat discectomy.
    Dai LY; Zhou Q; Yao WF; Shen L
    Surg Neurol; 2005 Sep; 64(3):226-31; discussion 231. PubMed ID: 16099250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure.
    Tsou PM; Alan Yeung C; Yeung AT
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 15363430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.
    Dewing CB; Provencher MT; Riffenburgh RH; Kerr S; Manos RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18165746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
    Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
    Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contemporary management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniations.
    Jegede KA; Ndu A; Grauer JN
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 20399360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for far lateral lumbar disc herniations: prospective study and outcome of 66 patients.
    Sasani M; Ozer AF; Oktenoglu T; Canbulat N; Sarioglu AC
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Apr; 50(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 17674295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for adolescent lumbar disc herniation: surgical outcomes in 46 consecutive patients.
    Lee DY; Ahn Y; Lee SH
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 Oct; 73(6):864-70. PubMed ID: 17117312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of revision discectomies following recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
    Papadopoulos EC; Girardi FP; Sandhu HS; Sama AA; Parvataneni HK; O'Leary PF; Cammisa FP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1473-6. PubMed ID: 16741457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A contrastive study of treating single level recurrent lumbar disc herniation].
    Meng X; Meng X; Shen Y; Dong Y; Cao J; Yang D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 22(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 18575439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect.
    Carragee EJ; Spinnickie AO; Alamin TF; Paragioudakis S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 16540869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision.
    Floman Y; Millgram MA; Smorgick Y; Rand N; Ashkenazi E
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 17607096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A minimally invasive transmuscular approach to far-lateral L5-S1 level disc herniations: a prospective study.
    Kotil K; Akcetin M; Bilge T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 17414982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic L5-S1 diskectomy: a cost-effective, minimally invasive general surgery--neurosurgery team alternative to laminectomy.
    Slotman GJ; Stein SC
    Am Surg; 1996 Jan; 62(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 8540649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.