These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20360827)

  • 1. Divisive normalization image quality metric revisited.
    Laparra V; Muñoz-Marí J; Malo J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Apr; 27(4):852-64. PubMed ID: 20360827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural similarity quality metrics in a coding context: exploring the space of realistic distortions.
    Brooks AC; Zhao X; Pappas TN
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1261-73. PubMed ID: 18632337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Input-output statistical independence in divisive normalization models of V1 neurons.
    Valerio R; Navarro R
    Network; 2003 Nov; 14(4):733-45. PubMed ID: 14653500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.
    Berman DW; Crump KS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():49-73. PubMed ID: 18686078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of the phase transfer function to visual function and visual quality metrics.
    Sarver EJ; Applegate RA
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S504-7. PubMed ID: 15523966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance.
    Lombardo M; Lombardo G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-31. PubMed ID: 20152616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of normalized point source sensitivity as a performance metric for large telescopes.
    Seo BJ; Nissly C; Angeli G; Ellerbroek B; Nelson J; Sigrist N; Troy M
    Appl Opt; 2009 Nov; 48(31):5997-6007. PubMed ID: 19881667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Praise of Artifice Reloaded: Caution With Natural Image Databases in Modeling Vision.
    Martinez-Garcia M; Bertalmío M; Malo J
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():8. PubMed ID: 30894796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A versatile model for packet loss visibility and its application to packet prioritization.
    Lin TL; Kanumuri S; Zhi Y; Poole D; Cosman PC; Reibman AR
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Mar; 19(3):722-35. PubMed ID: 20028623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual video coding based on SSIM-inspired divisive normalization.
    Wang S; Rehman A; Wang Z; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Apr; 22(4):1418-29. PubMed ID: 23221823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bühren J; Pesudovs K; Martin T; Strenger A; Yoon G; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 19393883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal coding through divisive normalization models of V1 neurons.
    Valerio R; Navarro R
    Network; 2003 Aug; 14(3):579-93. PubMed ID: 12938772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved performance of bayesian solutions for inverse electrocardiography using multiple information sources.
    Serinagaoglu Y; Brooks DH; MacLeod RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):2024-34. PubMed ID: 17019867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locally adaptive perceptual image coding.
    Höntsch I; Karam LJ
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2000; 9(9):1472-83. PubMed ID: 18262986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality assessment by visual gradient similarity.
    Zhu J; Wang N
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Mar; 21(3):919-33. PubMed ID: 21965204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A boosting framework for visuality-preserving distance metric learning and its application to medical image retrieval.
    Yang L; Jin R; Mummert L; Sukthankar R; Goode A; Zheng B; Hoi SC; Satyanarayanan M
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Jan; 32(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 19926897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A full-reference quality metric for geometrically distorted images.
    D'Angelo A; Zhaoping L; Barni M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Apr; 19(4):867-81. PubMed ID: 19887314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opponent-motion mechanisms are self-normalizing.
    Rainville SJ; Makous WL; Scott-Samuel NE
    Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(9):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15707920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB).
    Ferzli R; Karam LJ
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Apr; 18(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 19278916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.