These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20361039)

  • 1. ERP characterization of sustained attention effects in visual lexical categorization.
    Martin CD; Thierry G; Démonet JF
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9892. PubMed ID: 20361039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid implicit extraction of abstract orthographic patterns of Chinese characters during reading.
    Zhang X; Yang S; Jiang M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229590. PubMed ID: 32084247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution.
    Bentin S; Mouchetant-Rostaing Y; Giard MH; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 May; 11(3):235-60. PubMed ID: 10402254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down modulation of brain responses in spelling error recognition.
    Larionova E; Garakh Z; Martynova O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 May; 235():103891. PubMed ID: 36933384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing links between visual short term memory, visual attention and cognitive control processes through practice: An electrophysiological insight.
    Fuggetta G; Duke PA
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():48-60. PubMed ID: 28396214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A change of task prolongs early processes: evidence from ERPs in lexical tasks.
    Elchlepp H; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Apr; 144(2):299-325. PubMed ID: 25844623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Leone-Fernandez B
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107556. PubMed ID: 32682796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: an ERP study.
    Rosazza C; Cai Q; Minati L; Paulignan Y; Nazir TA
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1272():32-44. PubMed ID: 19332032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.
    Eisenhauer S; Fiebach CJ; Gagl B
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 31072907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down modulation of ventral occipito-temporal responses during visual word recognition.
    Twomey T; Kawabata Duncan KJ; Price CJ; Devlin JT
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1242-51. PubMed ID: 21232615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaction of top-down category-level expectation and bottom-up sensory input in early stages of visual-orthographic processing.
    Wang F; Maurer U
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107299. PubMed ID: 31821829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.
    Schomaker J; Meeter M
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):995-1011. PubMed ID: 24402203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond the initial 140 ms, lexical decision and reading aloud are different tasks: An ERP study with topographic analysis.
    Mahé G; Zesiger P; Laganaro M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():65-72. PubMed ID: 26244274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chronometry of visual word recognition during passive and lexical decision tasks: an ERP investigation.
    Simon G; Bernard C; Largy P; Lalonde R; Rebai M
    Int J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 114(11):1401-32. PubMed ID: 15636353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of Neurophysiological Markers of Verbal Information Processing Using Cognitive Evoked Potentials for Studying Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.
    Nuzhina NS; Prodius PA; Mukhina IV
    Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2022; 14(6):53-61. PubMed ID: 37181282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures.
    López Zunini RA; Baart M; Samuel AG; Armstrong BC
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107305. PubMed ID: 31838100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.