These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20361699)

  • 21. Frequency selectivity as a potential measure of noise damage susceptibility.
    Bergman M; Najenson T; Korn C; Harel N; Erenthal P; Sachartov E
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1586845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The likelihood of detecting a significant hearing threshold shift among noise-exposed workers subjected to annual audiometric testing.
    Hétu R; Quoc HT; Duguay P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1990 Aug; 34(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 2240990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The usefulness of impedance audiometry for the diagnosis of occupational hearing loss].
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1995; 49(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 7566996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical and audiological values in the early diagnosis of hearing impairments and risk groups among ship repair workers.
    Kononov ОY; Matiukha LF; Batsiura GV; Protsiuk OV; Klymenko LV; Veselova TV
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(4):600-603. PubMed ID: 31055540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hearing loss due to partly impulsive industrial noise exposure at levels between 87 and 90 dB(A).
    Thiery L; Meyer-Bisch C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):651-9. PubMed ID: 3262638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers.
    Ologe FE; Olajide TG; Nwawolo CC; Oyejola BA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug; 122(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 17666128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of age and sex on hearing threshold levels in workers exposed to different intensity levels of occupational noise.
    Szanto C; Ionescu M
    Audiology; 1983; 22(4):339-56. PubMed ID: 6615339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Audiometry in the cellulose industry].
    Corrao CR; Milano L; Pedulla P; Carlesi G; Bacaloni A; Monaco E
    G Ital Med Lav; 1993; 15(1-4):71-5. PubMed ID: 7720969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Hearing loss of workers in mining--a 6-year longitudinal study].
    Szanto C; Ionescu M
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 Jan; 36(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 2316255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise.
    Zhao YM; Qiu W; Zeng L; Chen SS; Cheng XR; Davis RI; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 20588120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Auditory threshold and the degree of its temporary and permanent shifts in the textile industry workers].
    Mikołajczyk H; Cieślewicz A
    Med Pr; 1982; 33(1-3):57-64. PubMed ID: 7144543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Dosimetric evaluation of noise and results of the audiometric examination of a selected group of workers in the refinery-petrochemical industry].
    Latkowski B; Zalewski P; Sułkowski W; Puzio J
    Med Pr; 1987; 38(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 3451021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Workplace noise exposure and audiometric thresholds in dental technicians.
    Musacchio A; Corrao CRN; Altissimi G; Scarpa A; Girolamo SD; Stadio AD; Greco A; Ralli M
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Sep; 23(2):108-115. PubMed ID: 32009344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined effects of ototoxic solvents and noise on hearing in automobile plant workers in Iran.
    Mohammadi S; Labbafinejad Y; Attarchi M
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2010 Sep; 61(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 20860967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Audiologic characteristics in a sample of recently-separated military Veterans: The Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study (NOISE Study).
    Gordon JS; Griest SE; Thielman EJ; Carlson KF; Helt WJ; Lewis MS; Blankenship C; Austin D; Theodoroff SM; Henry JA
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():21-30. PubMed ID: 27913314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiological evaluation in workers exposed to noise and pesticide.
    Guida HL; Morini RG; Cardoso AC
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 20835526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A cross-sectional study of hearing thresholds among 4627 Norwegian train and track maintenance workers.
    Lie A; Skogstad M; Johnsen TS; Engdahl B; Tambs K
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e005529. PubMed ID: 25324318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extended high-frequency audiometry in subjects exposed to occupational noise.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    B-ENT; 2008; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18949961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noise levels and hearing ability of female workers in a textile factory in Vietnam.
    Nguyen AL; Nguyen TC; Van TL; Hoang MH; Nguyen S; Jonai H; Villanueva MB; Matsuda S; Sotoyama M; Sudo A
    Ind Health; 1998 Jan; 36(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9473860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.