These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362374)

  • 21. Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees' brain.
    Reilly KT; Mercier C; Schieber MH; Sirigu A
    Brain; 2006 Aug; 129(Pt 8):2211-23. PubMed ID: 16799174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Real-time and offline performance of pattern recognition myoelectric control using a generic electrode grid with targeted muscle reinnervation patients.
    Tkach DC; Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jul; 22(4):727-34. PubMed ID: 24760931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identification of neuromuscular synergies in natural upper-arm movements.
    Sabatini AM
    Biol Cybern; 2002 Apr; 86(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 11956806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of a noninvasive command scheme for upper-limb prostheses in a virtual reality reach and grasp task.
    Kaliki RR; Davoodi R; Loeb GE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Mar; 60(3):792-802. PubMed ID: 22287229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Composite forearm free fillet flaps to preserve stump length following traumatic amputations of the upper extremity.
    Flurry M; Melissinos EG; Livingston CK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 60(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 18362566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Active upper limb prosthesis based on natural movement trajectories.
    Ramírez-García A; Leija L; Muñoz R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):58-72. PubMed ID: 20196688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies.
    Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 33933105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks.
    Thies SB; Kenney LP; Sobuh M; Galpin A; Kyberd P; Stine R; Major MJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():137-143. PubMed ID: 28684214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Motor control over the phantom limb in above-elbow amputees and its relationship with phantom limb pain.
    Gagné M; Reilly KT; Hétu S; Mercier C
    Neuroscience; 2009 Aug; 162(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 19406214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative Eye Gaze and Movement Differences in Visuomotor Adaptations to Varying Task Demands Among Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users.
    Hebert JS; Boser QA; Valevicius AM; Tanikawa H; Lavoie EB; Vette AH; Pilarski PM; Chapman CS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911197. PubMed ID: 31517965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cineplasty as a control input for externally powered prosthetic components.
    Weir RF; Heckathorne CW; Childress DS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 11563487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of arm movements on the lower limb during gait after a stroke.
    Stephenson JL; De Serres SJ; Lamontagne A
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jan; 31(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19854654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
    Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements.
    Krasoulis A; Kyranou I; Erden MS; Nazarpour K; Vijayakumar S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 28697795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decoding the grasping intention from electromyography during reaching motions.
    Batzianoulis I; Krausz NE; Simon AM; Hargrove L; Billard A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 15(1):57. PubMed ID: 29940991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning.
    Vasan G; Pilarski PM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements.
    Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 24410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in quality of movements made with body-powered and myoelectric prostheses during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Gates DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Apr; 84():105311. PubMed ID: 33812199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Expanding control possibilities of myoelectric hand prostheses].
    Reischl M; Mikut R; Pylatiuk C; Schulz S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():868-70. PubMed ID: 12465328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Task discrimination from myoelectric activity: a learning scheme for EMG-based interfaces.
    Liarokapis MV; Artemiadis PK; Kyriakopoulos KJ
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650366. PubMed ID: 24187185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.