266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362766)
1. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material.
Stober T; Johnson GH; Schmitter M
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 20362766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.
Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
