These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362858)

  • 1. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].
    Chiseliţă D; Cantemir A; Gălăţanu C; Irod A
    Oftalmologia; 2011; 55(4):104-10. PubMed ID: 22642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices.
    Rabsilber TM; Jepsen C; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 20152602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
    Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device.
    Shammas HJ; Chan S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1474-8. PubMed ID: 20692557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer.
    Cruysberg LP; Doors M; Verbakel F; Berendschot TT; De Brabander J; Nuijts RM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 19692383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anterior chamber depth measurements in eyes with an accommodating intraocular lens: agreement between partial coherence interferometry and optical coherence tomography.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 20457371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye.
    Jivrajka R; Shammas MC; Boenzi T; Swearingen M; Shammas HJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 18242456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes.
    Shen P; Zheng Y; Ding X; Liu B; Congdon N; Morgan I; He M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 23228592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers.
    Yeu E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 31279621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.