1002 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362902)
1. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents.
McNeill CJ; Wiltshire WA; Dawes C; Lavelle CL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 11606964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of fluoride release by resin-modified GIC and polyacid-modified composite resin.
Rix D; Foley TF; Banting D; Mamandras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 11606965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of fluoride-releasing light-cured resin on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
Tuncer C; Tuncer BB; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):14.e1-6; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19121495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Tagliani P; Klersy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 18005840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluoride release capacities of four different orthodontic adhesives.
Evrenol BI; Kucukkeles N; Arun T; Yarat A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10551131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets?
Pithon MM; dos Santos RL
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 20575204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glass-ionomer materials.
Yip HK; Smales RJ
Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 11203934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
Gorton J; Featherstone JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12532056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of fluoride release of orthodontic bonding adhesives.
Pithon MM; dos Santos RL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC; Nojima LI; Sant'anna EF
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 22299103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of fluoride uptake from dentin bonding agents and glass-ionomer cements in permanent and primary tooth enamel.
Eronat N; Kocatas N; Alpöz AR
Quintessence Int; 1999 Jul; 30(7):496-500. PubMed ID: 10635263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of intraoral aging on the setting status of resin composite and glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives.
Iliadi A; Baumgartner S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades T; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 24703280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
