207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362909)
1. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.
Chen Y; Lee JW; Cho WH; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20362909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
Chen Y; Kang ST; Bae SM; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental study.
Wehrbein H; Göllner P; Diedrich P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18828823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthodontic loading of titanium miniplates in dogs: microradiographic and histological evaluation.
Cornelis MA; Vandergugten S; Mahy P; De Clerck HJ; Lengelé B; D'Hoore W; Nyssen-Behets C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1054-62. PubMed ID: 18828822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants: histomorphometric and fluorescence analysis.
Serra G; Morais LS; Elias CN; Meyers MA; Andrade L; Müller CA; Müller M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 20122435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone response to early orthodontic loading of endosseous implants.
Yavuz U; Kirtiloglu T; Acikgoz G; Turk T; Trisi P
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():87-95. PubMed ID: 20594061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants.
Woods PW; Buschang PH; Owens SE; Rossouw PE; Opperman LA
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 19073958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
Freire JN; Silva NR; Gil JN; Magini RS; Coelho PG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants.
Serra G; Morais LS; Elias CN; Meyers MA; Andrade L; Muller C; Muller M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 18617102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early cortical bone healing around loaded titanium implants: a histological study in the rabbit.
Slaets E; Naert I; Carmeliet G; Duyck J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 19191791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: a histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction.
Luzi C; Verna C; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19164411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants.
Eliades T; Zinelis S; Papadopoulos MA; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):10.e1-7; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 19121491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic micro-implants].
Chen Y; Zhao WT; Kyung HM
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 42(10):605-7. PubMed ID: 18215368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
