These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362915)

  • 21. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage under orthodontic bands cemented with nano-hydroxyapatite-modified glass ionomer.
    Enan ET; Hammad SM
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):981-6. PubMed ID: 23745977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage and Microhardness of Ethanolic Extracts of Propolis in Different Proportions Added to Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Altunsoy M; Tanrıver M; Türkan U; Uslu ME; Silici S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 26950815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 19858075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Nazir M; Walsh T; Mandall NA; Matthew S; Fox D
    J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 38(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 21677099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Millett DT; Doubleday B; Alatsaris M; Love J; Wood D; Luther F; Devine D
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15784942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Williams PH; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 15947223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Yeo EJ; Yap WY; Ong DS; Tan JW
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 12540118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.
    Liebmann SM; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(5):348-60. PubMed ID: 10546417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements.
    Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 11764831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents.
    White SN; Sorensen JA; Kang SK; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Feb; 67(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 1538320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets.
    Moosavi H; Ahrari F; Mohamadipour H
    Prog Orthod; 2013 May; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 24325863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.