These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20362915)

  • 41. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):482-7. PubMed ID: 11203860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sealing properties of three luting agents used for complete cast crowns: a bacterial leakage study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Rincon SM; Serrano SA; Chaves C
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):E221-8. PubMed ID: 23570295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Protective effect of resin coating on the microleakage of Class V restorations following treatment with carbamide peroxide in vitro.
    Yu H; Li Q; Attin T; Wang Y
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 21180002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microleakage evaluation of core buildup composite resins with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems.
    Moosavi H; Moazzami SM; Loh S; Salari S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):009-16. PubMed ID: 20228982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements.
    Aggarwal M; Foley TF; Rix D
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 10961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under bonded lingual retainers.
    Baysal A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1084-8. PubMed ID: 18947287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.
    Li XJ; Zhao SJ; Niu LN; Tay FR; Jiao K; Gao Y; Chen JH
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24200871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
    Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Microleakage under lingual retainer composite bonded with an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 19885420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of Sandblasting and Type of Cement on the Bond Strength of Molar Bands on Stainless Steel Crowns.
    Bawazir OA; Elaraby A; Alshamrani H; Salama FS
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2015; 82(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 26349792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.