213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20363184)
1. An ERP study of the processing of response conflict in a dynamic localization task: the role of individual differences in task-appropriate behavior.
Fritzsche AS; Stahl J; Gibbons H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Aug; 121(8):1358-70. PubMed ID: 20363184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ERP study of target competition: individual differences in functional impulsive behavior.
Fritzsche AS; Stahl J; Gibbons H
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jul; 81(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 21510982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overactive performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder: ERP evidence from correct and erroneous reactions.
Endrass T; Klawohn J; Schuster F; Kathmann N
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1877-87. PubMed ID: 18514679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
Stahl J; Gibbons H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
Jonkman LM
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict.
Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; De Baene W; Verguts T; Notebaert W
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M
Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
Tanaka H
Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.
Poulsen C; Luu P; Davey C; Tucker DM
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):133-54. PubMed ID: 15922166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An electrophysiological correlate of conflict processing in an auditory spatial Stroop task: the effect of individual differences in navigational style.
Buzzell GA; Roberts DM; Baldwin CL; McDonald CG
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 23994425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching.
Swainson R; Jackson SR; Jackson GM
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16626653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal dynamics of conflict monitoring and the effects of one or two conflict sources on error-(related) negativity.
Armbrecht AS; Wöhrmann A; Gibbons H; Stahl J
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 20542082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural mechanism of conflict control in a number interference task.
Xiao X; Yang W; Jia L; Lei M; Chen A; Zhang Q
Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):979-83. PubMed ID: 22045253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
