296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20363418)
1. Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates.
Taber A; Romagnuolo J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):782-6. PubMed ID: 20363418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performing a quality colonoscopy: just slow down!
Vicari J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):787-8. PubMed ID: 20363419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Inflationary caution in GI endoscopy.
Sonnenberg A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):789-91. PubMed ID: 20363420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.
Williams JE; Le TD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 20970795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate.
Francis DL; Rodriguez-Correa DT; Buchner A; Harewood GC; Wallace M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):493-7. PubMed ID: 21353846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.
Liang J; Kalady MF; Appau K; Church J
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1323-7. PubMed ID: 22390284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surveillance after positive and negative colonoscopy examinations: issues, yields, and use.
Schoen RE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jun; 98(6):1237-46. PubMed ID: 12818263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.
Overholt BF; Brooks-Belli L; Grace M; Rankin K; Harrell R; Turyk M; Rosenberg FB; Barish RW; Gilinsky NH;
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 44(4):e80-6. PubMed ID: 19881361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.
Sawhney MS; Cury MS; Neeman N; Ngo LH; Lewis JM; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK; Aronson MD
Gastroenterology; 2008 Dec; 135(6):1892-8. PubMed ID: 18835390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy.
Brenner H; Haug U; Arndt V; Stegmaier C; Altenhofen L; Hoffmeister M
Gastroenterology; 2010 Mar; 138(3):870-6. PubMed ID: 19909750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.
Lin OS; Kozarek RA; Arai A; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Kowdley KV; McCormick SE; Schembre DB; Soon MS; Dominitz JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jun; 71(7):1253-9. PubMed ID: 20598251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance for screening colonoscopies.
Birkner B
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S43-4. PubMed ID: 18368643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduced polyp detection as endoscopy shift progresses: experience with screening colonoscopy at a tertiary-care hospital.
Long MD; Martin C; Sandler RS; Herfarth HH; Shaheen NJ; Dellon ES
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011 Mar; 45(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 21085007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Leung WK; Lo OS; Liu KS; Tong T; But DY; Lam FY; Hsu AS; Wong SY; Seto WK; Hung IF; Law WL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 109(6):855-63. PubMed ID: 24751581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.
Imperiale TF; Glowinski EA; Juliar BE; Azzouz F; Ransohoff DF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1288-95. PubMed ID: 19481649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
