356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20363901)
1. "Think" versus "feel" framing effects in persuasion.
Mayer ND; Tormala ZL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Apr; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 20363901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
Evans LM; Petty RE
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.
Lee AY; Aaker JL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 14769079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
Briñol P; Petty RE; Barden J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Nov; 93(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17983296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory.
Dijkstra A; Rothman A; Pietersma S
Psychol Health; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1036-48. PubMed ID: 21598188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of message framing in anti-binge drinking PSAs: the moderating role of counterfactual thinking.
Baek TH; Shen L; Reid LN
J Health Commun; 2013; 18(4):442-58. PubMed ID: 23289373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Making message recipients "feel right": how nonverbal cues can increase persuasion.
Cesario J; Higgins ET
Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 18466399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
Shen L
Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.
Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Message frames interact with motivational systems to determine depth of message processing.
Shen L; Dillard JP
Health Commun; 2009 Sep; 24(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 19735028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emotion and persuasion: cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes.
Petty RE; Briñol P
Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 25302943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
Bakker AB
AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.".
Cesario J; Grant H; Higgins ET
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Mar; 86(3):388-404. PubMed ID: 15008644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: the effects of source credibility in multiple message situations.
Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 17363764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of message framing within the stages of change on smoking cessation intentions and behaviors.
Cornacchione J; Smith SW
Health Commun; 2012; 27(6):612-22. PubMed ID: 22292861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin-cancer detection.
van 't Riet J; Ruiter RA; Werrij MQ; De Vries H
Psychol Health; 2010 Mar; 25(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 20204928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Persuading people to eat less junk food: a cognitive resource match between attitudinal ambivalence and health message framing.
Yan C
Health Commun; 2015; 30(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 24597561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptability of the H1N1 vaccine among older adults: the interplay of message framing and perceived vaccine safety and efficacy.
Nan X; Xie B; Madden K
Health Commun; 2012; 27(6):559-68. PubMed ID: 22092270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
