These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20363901)

  • 41. Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages.
    Kiene SM; Barta WD; Zelenski JM; Cothran DL
    Health Psychol; 2005 May; 24(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 15898869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predictors and the role of attitude toward the message and perceived message quality in gain- and loss-frame antidrug persuasion of adolescents.
    Cho H; Choi J
    Health Commun; 2010 Jun; 25(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 20512712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Self-generated persuasion: effects of the target and direction of arguments.
    Briñol P; McCaslin MJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):925-40. PubMed ID: 22352326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Moderating Role of Mood and Personal Relevance on Persuasive Effects of Gain- and Loss-Framed Health Messages.
    Wirtz JG; Sar S; Ghuge S
    Health Mark Q; 2015; 32(2):180-96. PubMed ID: 26075545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Promoting exercise behaviour: an integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour.
    Jones LW; Sinclair RC; Rhodes RE; Courneya KS
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):505-21. PubMed ID: 15509358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cognitive and affective matching effects in persuasion: an amplification perspective.
    Clarkson JJ; Tormala ZL; Rucker DD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1415-27. PubMed ID: 21734162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Resisting persuasion by illegitimate means: a metacognitive perspective on minority influence.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Mar; 33(3):354-67. PubMed ID: 17312317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing.
    Van 't Riet J; Cox AD; Cox D; Zimet GD; De Bruijn GJ; Van den Putte B; De Vries H; Werrij MQ; Ruiter RA
    Health Psychol Rev; 2016 Dec; 10(4):447-459. PubMed ID: 27062974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing and skin cancer prevention: a test of the congruency hypothesis.
    Hevey D; Dolan M
    J Health Psychol; 2014 Aug; 19(8):1003-12. PubMed ID: 23682057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of endorsers, framing, and rewards on the effectiveness of dietary supplement advertisements.
    Wu WY; Linn CT; Fu CS; Sukoco BM
    J Health Commun; 2012; 17(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 22004077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Incorporating Message Framing into Narrative Persuasion to Curb E-Cigarette Use Among College Students.
    Liu S; Yang JZ
    Risk Anal; 2020 Aug; 40(8):1677-1690. PubMed ID: 32390210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. When resistance is futile: consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty.
    Rucker DD; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):219-35. PubMed ID: 14769080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incidental experiences of affective coherence and incoherence influence persuasion.
    Huntsinger JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):792-802. PubMed ID: 23542415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 16938028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of self-affirmation in nonthreatening persuasion domains: timing affects the process.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Gallardo I; DeMarree KG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1533-46. PubMed ID: 17933742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: a functional evolutionary approach.
    Griskevicius V; Shiota MN; Neufeld SL
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):190-206. PubMed ID: 20364895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of self-control in resistance to persuasion.
    Burkley E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Mar; 34(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 18272808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Books: Mind Over Mood: Change How You Feel by Changing the Way You Think: Think Better, Feel Better.
    Mahmood SM
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jun; 66(647):321. PubMed ID: 27231301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.