These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2036461)
1. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic. Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent cytology and chlamydia sampling: a comparison of immunofluorescence and culture for detection of chlamydia. Szarewski A; Pompey A; Cronin D; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C; Thin RN Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(5):367-8. PubMed ID: 1958724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytobrush versus swab endocervical sampling for the detection of obstetric chlamydial infection. Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC Am J Perinatol; 1993 Jan; 10(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8442808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling. Szarewski A; Pompey A; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Dacron-tipped applicator and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infections. Weiland TL; Noller KL; Smith TF; Ory SJ J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Nov; 26(11):2437-8. PubMed ID: 2976774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture. Wandall DA; Ostergaard L; Overgaard L; Worm AM; Gutschik E APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of the type of swab on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis]. Giovannini N; Suárez de Basnec MC; Zapata M Rev Argent Microbiol; 1991; 23(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 1815280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection - a comparison of vaginal, first-catch urine, combined vaginal and first-catch urine and endocervical sampling. Falk L; Coble BI; Mjörnberg PA; Fredlund H Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Apr; 21(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 20378903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary evaluation of "Clearview Chlamydia" for the rapid detection of chlamydial antigen in cervical secretions. Young H; Moyes A; Lough H; Smith IW; McKenna JG; Thompson C Genitourin Med; 1991 Apr; 67(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2032704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for genital chlamydial infection in symptomatic women. Mittal A; Kapur S; Gupta S Indian J Med Res; 1993 Jun; 98():119-23. PubMed ID: 8225447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush. Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between chlamydia infection and clinical evaluation, vaginal wet smear, and cervical swab test in female adolescents. Thejls H; Rahm VA; Rosen G; Gnarpe H Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):974-6. PubMed ID: 3674172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. Srivasin V; Lim KB; Thirumoorthy T; Sng EH Singapore Med J; 1989 Oct; 30(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 2694373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females? Mahto M; Mallinson H Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture. Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears. Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of COBAS Taqman CT for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vulvo-vaginal swabs. Skidmore S; Kaye M; Bayliss D; Devendra S Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Aug; 84(4):277-8; discussion 278-9. PubMed ID: 18305120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]