96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2036461)
1. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent cytology and chlamydia sampling: a comparison of immunofluorescence and culture for detection of chlamydia.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Cronin D; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C; Thin RN
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(5):367-8. PubMed ID: 1958724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytobrush versus swab endocervical sampling for the detection of obstetric chlamydial infection.
Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC
Am J Perinatol; 1993 Jan; 10(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8442808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C
Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Dacron-tipped applicator and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infections.
Weiland TL; Noller KL; Smith TF; Ory SJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Nov; 26(11):2437-8. PubMed ID: 2976774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
Wandall DA; Ostergaard L; Overgaard L; Worm AM; Gutschik E
APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME
Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of the type of swab on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis].
Giovannini N; Suárez de Basnec MC; Zapata M
Rev Argent Microbiol; 1991; 23(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 1815280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection - a comparison of vaginal, first-catch urine, combined vaginal and first-catch urine and endocervical sampling.
Falk L; Coble BI; Mjörnberg PA; Fredlund H
Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Apr; 21(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 20378903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary evaluation of "Clearview Chlamydia" for the rapid detection of chlamydial antigen in cervical secretions.
Young H; Moyes A; Lough H; Smith IW; McKenna JG; Thompson C
Genitourin Med; 1991 Apr; 67(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2032704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for genital chlamydial infection in symptomatic women.
Mittal A; Kapur S; Gupta S
Indian J Med Res; 1993 Jun; 98():119-23. PubMed ID: 8225447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between chlamydia infection and clinical evaluation, vaginal wet smear, and cervical swab test in female adolescents.
Thejls H; Rahm VA; Rosen G; Gnarpe H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):974-6. PubMed ID: 3674172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens.
Srivasin V; Lim KB; Thirumoorthy T; Sng EH
Singapore Med J; 1989 Oct; 30(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 2694373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females?
Mahto M; Mallinson H
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.
Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM
Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of COBAS Taqman CT for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vulvo-vaginal swabs.
Skidmore S; Kaye M; Bayliss D; Devendra S
Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Aug; 84(4):277-8; discussion 278-9. PubMed ID: 18305120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
