These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20364919)
21. Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task. Joseph JS; Chun MM; Nakayama K Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):805-7. PubMed ID: 9194560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors. Zhang P; Chen X; Yuan P; Zhang D; He S Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):715-24. PubMed ID: 16956775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Attentional capture in rapid serial visual presentation. Shih SI; Reeves A Spat Vis; 2007; 20(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 17594797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. Moore T; Fallah M J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 13679398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: the special role of object onset. Cole GG; Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Cole GG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):464-77. PubMed ID: 15161379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: evidence from a probe-dot detection task. Agter F; Donk M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):722-30. PubMed ID: 16131245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task. Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 16730675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus. Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigating a space-variant weighted salience account of visual selection. Vincent BT; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(13):1809-20. PubMed ID: 17466357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing the time course and efficacy of spatial and feature-based attention. Liu T; Stevens ST; Carrasco M Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17087987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance. Roelofs A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield. Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes. Stirk JA; Underwood G J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm. Magen H; Cohen A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 20364926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]