118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20367507)
1. Accuracy assessment of the Dinamap ProCare 400 in pregnancy and preeclampsia.
De Greeff A; Ghosh D; Anthony J; Shennan A
Hypertens Pregnancy; 2010 Jan; 29(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 20367507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of inflationary versus deflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and preeclampsia: OMRON-MIT versus OMRON-M7.
de Greeff A; Beg Z; Gangji Z; Dorney E; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 19252437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
de Greeff A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17303988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population.
Reinders A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 16932038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical accuracy of a low cost portable blood pressure device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: the Nissei DS-400.
de Greeff A; Shennan AH
Trop Doct; 2015 Jul; 45(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 25911652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An accurate automated blood pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: the Microlife 3BTO-A.
Reinders A; Cuckson AC; Lee JT; Shennan AH
BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):915-20. PubMed ID: 15957992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
Reinders A; Cuckson AC; Jones CR; Poet R; O'Sullivan G; Shennan AH
BJOG; 2003 Feb; 110(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12618156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical accuracy of inflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: Omron-MIT Elite.
Chung Y; Brochut MC; de Greeff A; Shennan AH
Pregnancy Hypertens; 2012 Oct; 2(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 26105612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Withings BP-800 in pregnancy and impact of maternal characteristics on the accuracy of blood pressure measurement.
Hay A; Ayis S; Nzelu D; James L; Kametas NA
Pregnancy Hypertens; 2016 Oct; 6(4):406-412. PubMed ID: 27939491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Rossmax (ME 701 series) upper arm device: accuracy assessment in an adult population according to the International and the British Hypertension Society protocols.
de Greeff A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18199923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Omron M7 and Microlife 3BTO-A blood pressure measuring devices in preeclampsia.
Nouwen E; Snijder M; van Montfrans G; Wolf H
Hypertens Pregnancy; 2012; 31(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 21332327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A self-measurement device suitable for hospital use: validation of the Spengler Pro M according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
de Greeff A; Ahmed N; Sheppard E; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 18496298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Portapres with standard sphygmomanometry in pregnancy.
Hehenkamp WJ; Rang S; van Goudoever J; Bos WJ; Wolf H; van der Post JA
Hypertens Pregnancy; 2002; 21(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 12044344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative accuracy of sequential same-arm and simultaneous opposite-arm measurements for the intra-arterial validation of blood pressure monitors.
Penny JA; Shennan AH; Halligan AW; Taylor DJ; de Swiet M; Anthony J
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 10450119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the A&D UA-1020 upper-arm blood pressure monitor with six different-shaped or different-sized cuffs according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Zeng WF; Kang YY; Liu M; Li Y; Wang JG
Blood Press Monit; 2013 Oct; 18(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 24013618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol and the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Saladini F; Benetti E; Masiero S; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):258-61. PubMed ID: 21885961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and compliance of a home monitoring device in pregnancy: microlife WatchBP home.
Chung Y; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Hypertens Pregnancy; 2009; 28(3):348-59. PubMed ID: 19263287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
