These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2036796)

  • 1. The assessment of IUD mechanical resistance: an experimental model.
    Custo G; Saitto C; Scoccia G; Volpe R; Cerza S
    Contraception; 1991 Mar; 43(3):251-62. PubMed ID: 2036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mechanical resistance of intrauterine devices. Experimental evaluation].
    Custo GM; Cerza S; Liotta L; Saitto C; Scoccia G; Volpe R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Apr; 44(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 1584443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Intrauterine devices for contraception? Results of an inquiry conducted in the BRD in 1976].
    Stolp W; Spandau S; Hildenbrand G; Sommerhoff C; Schulmann K
    Fortschr Med; 1977 Oct; 95(39):2347-52. PubMed ID: 914192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the intrauterine device.
    Mishell DR
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1140345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of breastfeeding on IUD performance.
    Cole LP; McCann MF; Higgins JE; Waszak CS
    Am J Public Health; 1983 Apr; 73(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 6829821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of the contraceptive mechanism of the Cu-intrauterine device and the plastic-intrauterine device in rats.
    Takahashi K; Hirose Y; Haneda A; Mizukami T; Okamura K; Suzuki M
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1978 Dec; 126(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 568834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface changes in intrauterine contraceptive devices after variable use.
    Keith L; Bailey R; Berger GS; Method M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 152(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 3993713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Staying time for intrauterine devices].
    Bailer P
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Jan; 102(2):71. PubMed ID: 830532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrauterine device use and endometrial cancer risk.
    Sturgeon SR; Brinton LA; Berman ML; Mortel R; Twiggs LB; Barrett RJ; Wilbanks GD; Lurain JR
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 9222773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrauterine contraceptive devices for diabetic women.
    Thiery M; Van Kets H; Kurz K; Rottiers R; Derom R
    Lancet; 1982 Oct; 2(8303):883. PubMed ID: 6126745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms.
    Morgan KW
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17081937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Standard demands concerning a new IUD are the same as for heart valves].
    Lakartidningen; 1997 Jun; 94(25):2402-4. PubMed ID: 9229664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
    Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New observations in the sonographic evaluation of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Najarian KE; Kurtz AB
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Apr; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 3514951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine rupture of the intrauterine device "ML Cu 250": an uncommon complication: presentation of a case.
    Custo G; Saitto C; Cerza S; Cosmi EV
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Jan; 45(1):130-1. PubMed ID: 3943643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Control methods of intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Vajda R; Kun L
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(9):554-8. PubMed ID: 936821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intrauterine device, the best method for spacing births in breastfeeding mothers].
    Blum M; Kaplan B
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Nov; 87(11):523-5. PubMed ID: 1480920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intrauterine contraception using the IUD DANA Super].
    Sarembe B
    Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1972 Apr; 27(15):686-9. PubMed ID: 5031833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.