149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20368672)
1. A retrospective data analysis of antimicrobial dressing usage in 3,084 patients.
Fife CE; Carter MJ; Walker D; Thomson B
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2010 Mar; 56(3):28-42. PubMed ID: 20368672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of neonatal and pediatric wounds: a retrospective examination of clinical outcomes.
Baharestani MM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Jun; 53(6):75-85. PubMed ID: 17586874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds.
Wood L; Wood Z; Davis P; Wilkins J
J Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 19(7):287-8, 290-3. PubMed ID: 20616771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dressings impregnated in antibacterial agent: multicenter study on acute and chronic wounds, with Atrauman Ag].
Rueda López J; Martínez Cuervo F; Verdú Soriano J; Segovia Gómez T
Rev Enferm; 2010 Nov; 33(11):6-15. PubMed ID: 21188867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds.
Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25543819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy on wounds of the diabetic foot.
Armstrong DG; Lavery LA; Abu-Rumman P; Espensen EH; Vazquez JR; Nixon BP; Boulton AJ
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Apr; 48(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 11993062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using a silver-coated polymeric substrate for the management of chronic ulcerations: the initial Mayo Clinic experience.
Moore RA; Liedl DA; Jenkins S; Andrews KL
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Nov; 21(11):517-20. PubMed ID: 18981754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of Acticoat Burn Dressing for management of microbial contamination in cultured skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice.
Supp AP; Neely AN; Supp DM; Warden GD; Boyce ST
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 15879745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefit of hydrocolloid SSD dressing in the outpatient management of partial thickness burns.
Muangman P; Muangman S; Opasanon S; Keorochana K; Chuntrasakul C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Oct; 92(10):1300-5. PubMed ID: 19845237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
Martineau L; Shek PN
Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Management of venous leg ulcer by French physicians, diversity and related costs: a prospective medicoeconomic observational study].
Lévy E; Lévy P
J Mal Vasc; 2001 Feb; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11240528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrocolloid dressing in pediatric burns may decrease operative intervention rates.
Martin FT; O'Sullivan JB; Regan PJ; McCann J; Kelly JL
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Mar; 45(3):600-5. PubMed ID: 20223327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Full-thickness skin grafts: maximizing graft take using negative pressure dressings to prepare the graft bed.
Landau AG; Hudson DA; Adams K; Geldenhuys S; Pienaar C
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Jun; 60(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 18520204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Release of antibiotics from collagen dressing.
Grzybowski J; Antos-Bielska M; Ołdak E; Trafny EA
Polim Med; 1997; 27(3-4):3-9. PubMed ID: 9513248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
