These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20368980)

  • 1. Differences in ultrasonic vocalizations between wild and laboratory California mice (Peromyscus californicus).
    Kalcounis-Rueppell MC; Petric R; Briggs JR; Carney C; Marshall MM; Willse JT; Rueppell O; Ribble DO; Crossland JP
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e9705. PubMed ID: 20368980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in ultrasonic vocalizations and coordinated movement in the California mouse (Peromyscus californicus).
    Wright SL; Brown RE
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 15222963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two pup vocalization types are genetically and functionally separable in deer mice.
    Jourjine N; Woolfolk ML; Sanguinetti-Scheck JI; Sabatini JE; McFadden S; Lindholm AK; Hoekstra HE
    Curr Biol; 2023 Apr; 33(7):1237-1248.e4. PubMed ID: 36893759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production of ultrasonic vocalizations by Peromyscus mice in the wild.
    Kalcounis-Rueppell MC; Metheny JD; Vonhof MJ
    Front Zool; 2006 Feb; 3():3. PubMed ID: 16507093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male fidelity expressed through rapid testosterone suppression of ultrasonic vocalizations to novel females in the monogamous California mouse.
    Pultorak JD; Fuxjager MJ; Kalcounis-Rueppell MC; Marler CA
    Horm Behav; 2015 Apr; 70():47-56. PubMed ID: 25725427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vocal signals with different social or non-social contexts in two wild rodent species (Mus caroli and Rattus losea).
    Chen Y; Xiang Z; Su Q; Qin J; Liu Q
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Jun; 26(3):963-972. PubMed ID: 36683113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social context increases ultrasonic vocalizations during restraint in adult mice.
    Lefebvre E; Granon S; Chauveau F
    Anim Cogn; 2020 Mar; 23(2):351-359. PubMed ID: 31925602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pair-bonding leads to convergence in approach behavior to conspecific vocalizations in California mice (Peromyscus californicus).
    Rieger NS; Monari PK; Hartfield K; Schefelker J; Marler CA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255295. PubMed ID: 34383820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alcohol-naïve USVs distinguish male HAD-1 from LAD-1 rat strains.
    Mittal N; Thakore N; Reno JM; Bell RL; Maddox WT; Schallert T; Duvauchelle CL
    Alcohol; 2018 May; 68():9-17. PubMed ID: 29427829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CBA/CaJ mouse ultrasonic vocalizations depend on prior social experience.
    Burke K; Screven LA; Dent ML
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197774. PubMed ID: 29874248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of prenatal ethanol exposure on acoustic characteristics of play fighting-induced ultrasonic vocalizations in juvenile rats.
    Shahrier MA; Wada H
    Neurotoxicology; 2020 Jul; 79():25-39. PubMed ID: 32294486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rodent ultrasonic vocal interaction resolved with millimeter precision using hybrid beamforming.
    Sterling ML; Teunisse R; Englitz B
    Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37493217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A role for strain differences in waveforms of ultrasonic vocalizations during male-female interaction.
    Sugimoto H; Okabe S; Kato M; Koshida N; Shiroishi T; Mogi K; Kikusui T; Koide T
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22093. PubMed ID: 21818297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic vocalizations - Novel seizure-related manifestation in rats.
    Lara-Valderrábano L; Ciszek R; Bañuelos-Cabrera I; Andrade P; Pitkänen A
    Epilepsy Res; 2022 Jul; 183():106927. PubMed ID: 35526332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 22 kHz and 55 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations differentially influence neural and behavioral outcomes: Implications for modeling anxiety via auditory stimuli in the rat.
    Demaestri C; Brenhouse HC; Honeycutt JA
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():134-145. PubMed ID: 30521931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative Affect-Associated USV Acoustic Characteristics Predict Future Excessive Alcohol Drinking and Alcohol Avoidance in Male P and NP Rats.
    Reno JM; Thakore N; Cormack LK; Schallert T; Bell RL; Maddox WT; Duvauchelle CL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Apr; 41(4):786-797. PubMed ID: 28118495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rodent ultrasonic vocalizations as biomarkers of future alcohol use: A predictive analytic approach.
    Mittal N; Todd Maddox W; Schallert T; Duvauchelle CL
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 18(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 29209998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of vocalizations emitted in isolation by California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) pups throughout the postnatal period.
    Johnson SA; Painter MS; Javurek AB; Murphy CR; Howald EC; Khan ZZ; Conard CM; Gant KL; Ellersieck MR; Hoffmann F; Schenk AK; Rosenfeld CS
    J Comp Psychol; 2017 Feb; 131(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 28182483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonic vocalizations induced by sex and amphetamine in M2, M4, M5 muscarinic and D2 dopamine receptor knockout mice.
    Wang H; Liang S; Burgdorf J; Wess J; Yeomans J
    PLoS One; 2008 Apr; 3(4):e1893. PubMed ID: 18382674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations emitted by infant rodents.
    Branchi I; Santucci D; Alleva E
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2006; Chapter 13():Unit13.12. PubMed ID: 23045127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.