690 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20369081)
21. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of varying the vertical dimension of connectors of cantilever cross-arch fixed dental prostheses in patients with severely reduced osseous support: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Manda M; Galanis C; Georgiopoulos V; Provatidis C; Koidis P
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 20141813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.
Corrêa CB; Margonar R; Noritomi PY; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24355510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
