These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20369098)
1. Assessment of the availability of bone volume for grafting in the donor retromolar region using computed tomography: a pilot study. Cremonini CC; Dumas M; Pannuti C; Lima LA; Cavalcanti MG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 20369098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized tomography-assisted calculation of sinus augmentation volume. Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Maier H; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 17190300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human bone repair after mandibular symphysis block harvesting: a clinical and tomographic study. Verdugo F; Simonian K; D'Addona A; Pontón J; Nowzari H J Periodontol; 2010 May; 81(5):702-9. PubMed ID: 20429649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Healing of donor defect after mandibular parasymphyseal block harvesting: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. Sbordone C; Toti P; Guidetti F; Martuscelli R; Califano L; Sbordone L J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 40(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 21872482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in the volume and density of calvarial split bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation. Smolka W; Eggensperger N; Carollo V; Ozdoba C; Iizuka T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16584410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT scan study of the mandibular nerve intra-mandibular path. Drikes S; Delcampe P; Sabin P; Lavis JF; Cordier G; Vacher C; Péron JM Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2011 Jun; 112(3):e5-10. PubMed ID: 21570100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Autogenous bone graft from the mandibular ramus: a technique for bone augmentation. Capelli M Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Jun; 23(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 12854778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Cremonini CC; Dumas M; Pannuti CM; Neto JB; Cavalcanti MG; Lima LA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):845-50. PubMed ID: 21621979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks. Zeltner M; Flückiger LB; Hämmerle CH; Hüsler J; Benic GI Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):999-1004. PubMed ID: 26748953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of volumetry and density of mandibular symphysis bone grafts by three-dimensional computed tomography. Yavuz MS; Buyukkurt MC; Tozoglu S; Dagsuyu IM; Kantarci M Dent Traumatol; 2009 Oct; 25(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 19754697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular lower border: donor site of choice for alveolar grafting. Cotter CJ; Maher A; Gallagher C; Sleeman D Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 40(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 12379191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography and computer-aided design for locating available palatal bone for grafting: two case reports. Rodriguez-Recio O; Rodriguez-Recio C; Gallego L; Junquera L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 20209202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars-part II: the effect of bone image superimposition and intraradicular contrast medium on radiograph interpretation. Fan B; Gao Y; Fan W; Gutmann JL J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 18215673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetry of bone grafts by three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction: an animal study in the minipig. Jensen J; Kragskov J; Wenzel A; Sindet-Pedersen S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 9482022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An anatomical radiographic evaluation of the posterior portion of the mandible in relation to autologous bone harvest procedures. Di Bari R; Coronelli R; Cicconetti A J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):e475-83. PubMed ID: 25203591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The three-dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible. Moon HS; Won YY; Kim KD; Ruprecht A; Kim HJ; Kook HK; Chung MK Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):466-73. PubMed ID: 15146293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mandibular retromolar area as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: surgical notes. Fakhry A Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Jun; 31(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 21556384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible. Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Chaushu G Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 19673921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: prospective analysis using CT image analyzer. Ozawa T; Omura S; Fukuyama E; Matsui Y; Torikai K; Fujita K Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 May; 44(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17477757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between multislice and cone-beam computerized tomography in the volumetric assessment of cleft palate. Albuquerque MA; Gaia BF; Cavalcanti MG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 21664153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]