These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20369763)

  • 21. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes.
    Suehiro K; Tanaka K; Funao T; Matsuura T; Mori T; Nishikawa K
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 111(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 23479677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Mayer J; Boldt J; Schöllhorn T; Röhm KD; Mengistu AM; Suttner S
    Br J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 98(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17218375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Greiwe G; Peters V; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Kubik M; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 31456071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
    Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output.
    Bubenek-Turconi SI; Craciun M; Miclea I; Perel A
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
    Rauch H; Müller M; Fleischer F; Bauer H; Martin E; Böttiger BW
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2002 Apr; 46(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 11952444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Continuous cardiac output monitoring with an uncalibrated pulse contour method in patients supported with mechanical pulsatile assist device.
    Scolletta S; Miraldi F; Romano SM; Muzzi L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 13(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21454314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Agreement between cardiac output estimation with a wireless, wearable pulse decomposition analysis device and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.
    Khanna AK; Garcia JO; Saha AK; Harris L; Baruch M; Martin RS
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2024 Feb; 38(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 37458916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Milam AJ; Ghoddoussi F; Lucaj J; Narreddy S; Kumar N; Reddy V; Hakim J; Krishnan SH
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(2):514-529. PubMed ID: 32622708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.
    Cho YJ; Koo CH; Kim TK; Hong DM; Jeon Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):771-782. PubMed ID: 26429135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
    Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    de Waal EE; Kalkman CJ; Rex S; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1904-9. PubMed ID: 17581493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical evaluation of intraoperative cardiac output measurement by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method( FloTrac/Vigileo) in open heart surgery].
    Furukawa H; Ohkado A; Nagashima M; Ohsawa H; Ichikawa S
    Kyobu Geka; 2013 Aug; 66(9):775-83. PubMed ID: 23917227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis: validation of the third-generation software in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.
    Tsai YF; Su BC; Lin CC; Liu FC; Lee WC; Yu HP
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Mar; 44(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 22410036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo software to track changes in cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients: a polar plot approach.
    Desebbe O; Henaine R; Keller G; Koffel C; Garcia H; Rosamel P; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Haftek M; Critchley LA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1122-7. PubMed ID: 24011911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uncalibrated continuous cardiac output measurement in liver transplant patients: LiDCOrapid™ system versus pulmonary artery catheter.
    Costa MG; Chiarandini P; Scudeller L; Vetrugno L; Pompei L; Serena G; Buttera S; Della Rocca G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 24917057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Continuous versus intermittent cardiac output measurement in cardiac surgical patients undergoing hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Böttiger BW; Rauch H; Böhrer H; Motsch J; Soder M; Fleischer F; Martin E
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1995 Aug; 9(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 7579110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cardiac output measurement during cardiac surgery: esophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter.
    Su NY; Huang CJ; Tsai P; Hsu YW; Hung YC; Cheng CR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2002 Sep; 40(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 12434609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters.
    Hadian M; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
    Crit Care; 2010; 14(6):R212. PubMed ID: 21092290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system comparing with pulmonary artery catheter method by three versions].
    Terada T; Usami A; Iwasaki R; Toyoda D; Ozawa J; Ochiai R
    Masui; 2009 Nov; 58(11):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19928510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.