These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20369992)

  • 1. Accuracy of formant measurement for synthesized vowels using the reassigned spectrogram and comparison with linear prediction.
    Fulop SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 20369992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing measurement errors for formants in synthetic and natural vowels.
    Shadle CH; Nam H; Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):713-27. PubMed ID: 26936555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonetic applications of the time-corrected instantaneous frequency spectrogram.
    Fulop SA
    Phonetica; 2007; 64(4):237-62. PubMed ID: 18421245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static features in real-time recognition of isolated vowels at high pitch.
    Ferreira AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2389-404. PubMed ID: 17902873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formant frequency estimation of high-pitched vowels using weighted linear prediction.
    Alku P; Pohjalainen J; Vainio M; Laukkanen AM; Story BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1295-313. PubMed ID: 23927127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Ochoa F; Enzinger E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL54-60. PubMed ID: 23298018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of formant frequency measurements: a comparison of spectrographic analysis and linear prediction.
    Monsen RB; Engebretson AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 6223180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Formation of the actor's/speaker's formant: a study applying spectrum analysis and computer modeling.
    Leino T; Laukkanen AM; Radolf V
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 20456915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initialization method for speech separation algorithms that work in the time-frequency domain.
    Sarmiento A; Durán-Díaz I; Cruces S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):EL121-6. PubMed ID: 20369978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward optimizing stream fusion in multistream recognition of speech.
    Mesgarani N; Thomas S; Hermansky H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL14-8. PubMed ID: 21786862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of speaking rate and vowel length on formant frequency displacement in Japanese.
    Hirata Y; Tsukada K
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):129-49. PubMed ID: 19776664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral change.
    Morrison GS; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):EL15-22. PubMed ID: 17614372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target-locus scaling for modeling formant transitions in vowel + consonant + vowel utterances.
    Broad DJ; Clermont F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL192. PubMed ID: 28372044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2288-97. PubMed ID: 16642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
    Dejonckere P; Schoentgen J; Giordano A; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Manfredi C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 21689056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2842-54. PubMed ID: 18189574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic formant tracking of noisy speech using temporal analysis on outputs from a nonlinear cochlear model.
    Deng L; Kheirallah I
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):456-67. PubMed ID: 8225334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiband analysis and synthesis of spectro-temporal modulations of Fourier spectrogram.
    Chi TS; Hsu CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL190-6. PubMed ID: 21568374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowel acoustics in adults with apraxia of speech.
    Jacks A; Mathes KA; Marquardt TP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 20008683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonuniform speaker normalization using affine transformation.
    Bharath Kumar SV; Umesh S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1727-38. PubMed ID: 19045663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.