These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20370026)

  • 1. The loudness of sounds whose spectra differ at the two ears.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2433-40. PubMed ID: 20370026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of stimulus bandwidth on binaural loudness summation.
    Shao Z; Mo F; Mao D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1508-14. PubMed ID: 26428788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.
    Moore BC
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling binaural loudness.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1604-12. PubMed ID: 17407897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical bandwidth determined by masking in the presence of two narrow-band noises.
    Ishigami H; Suzuki T; Isojima G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1995; 22(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7677630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds: Tonal and noise stimuli.
    Jesteadt W; Wróblewski M; High R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3586. PubMed ID: 31255128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness reduction and adaptation induced by a contralateral tone.
    Botte MC; Baruch C; Scharf B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jul; 80(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 3745668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement and modeling of binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Gibbs A; Onions G; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):736-47. PubMed ID: 25096108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness of complex sounds as a function of the standard stimulus and the number of components.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Bonding P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Oct; 64(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 744827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trading of intensity and interaural coherence in dichotic pitch stimuli.
    Culling JF; Lewis HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20968362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directional loudness and binaural summation for wideband and reverberant sounds.
    Sivonen VP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2852-61. PubMed ID: 17550184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.
    Wang N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():150-156. PubMed ID: 26805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of temporal-masking patterns in the determination of subjective duration and loudness for ramped and damped sounds.
    Ries DT; Schlauch RS; DiGiovanni JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3772-83. PubMed ID: 19206803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dependence of binaural loudness summation on interaural level differences, spectral distribution, and temporal distribution.
    Zwicker E; Zwicker UT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):756-64. PubMed ID: 2016430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.
    Joshi SN; Wróblewski M; Schmid KK; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 26827032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrimination of the spectral structures of sound signals on the background of interference.
    Supin AY
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2008 Jun; 38(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 18607753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of perceptual weights to test a model of loudness summation.
    Leibold LJ; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL69. PubMed ID: 17927310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.