BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20370041)

  • 1. A psychoacoustic method to find the perceptual cues of stop consonants in natural speech.
    Li F; Menon A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2599-610. PubMed ID: 20370041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.
    Li F; Trevino A; Menon A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2663-75. PubMed ID: 23039459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3947. PubMed ID: 19206819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.
    Singh R; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3051-68. PubMed ID: 22501079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24993189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.
    Shofner WP; Campbell J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL398-404. PubMed ID: 23145701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roles of voice onset time and F0 in stop consonant voicing perception: effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering.
    Winn MB; Chatterjee M; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1097-107. PubMed ID: 23785185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual effects of plosive feature modification.
    Kapoor A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):478-91. PubMed ID: 22280609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.
    Bronkhorst AW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1465-87. PubMed ID: 25828463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.