BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20371921)

  • 1. The role and control of sludge age in biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Ekama GA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(7):1645-52. PubMed ID: 20371921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Ramphao M; Wentzel MC; Merritt R; Ekama GA; Young T; Buckley CA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes.
    Tam HL; Tang DT; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):59-65. PubMed ID: 15656296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental investigation of the external nitrification biological nutrient removal activated sludge (ENBNRAS) system.
    Hu ZR; Sötemann S; Moodley R; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Aug; 83(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 12783482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and performance of BNR activated sludge systems with flat sheet membranes for solid-liquid separation.
    du Toit GJ; Ramphao MC; Parco V; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):105-13. PubMed ID: 17898449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
    Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics in maximal settling capacity in an activated sludge treatment plant with highly loaded secondary settlers.
    Wilén BM; Lumley D; Nordqvist A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):187-94. PubMed ID: 15553475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological nutrient removal in a small-scale MBR treating household wastewater.
    Abegglen C; Ospelt M; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):338-46. PubMed ID: 17707877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process.
    Fuchs W; Resch C; Kernstock M; Mayer M; Schoeberl P; Braun R
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):803-10. PubMed ID: 15743625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of primary settling performance with activated sludge.
    Yetis U; Tarlan E
    Environ Technol; 2002 Apr; 23(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 12088362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of sludge properties and hydraulic loading on the performance of secondary settling tanks--full-scale operational results.
    Vestner RJ; Günthert FW
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):179-86. PubMed ID: 15553474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effective upgrading of a biological wastewater treatment plant by using lamella separators with bypass operation.
    Jardin N; Rath L; Schönfeld A; Grünebaum T
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1619-25. PubMed ID: 18520020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The UASB reactor as an alternative for the septic tank for on-site sewage treatment.
    Coelho AL; do Nascimento MB; Cavalcanti PF; van Haandel AC
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):221-6. PubMed ID: 14753540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysing sludge balance in activated sludge systems with a novel mass transport model.
    Patziger M; Kainz H; Hunze M; Józsa J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1413-9. PubMed ID: 18496007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solids characterisation in an anaerobic migrating bed reactor (AMBR) sewage treatment system.
    Lant P; Hartley K
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2437-48. PubMed ID: 17451779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological nutrient removal in simple dual sludge system with an UMBR (upflow multi-layer bioreactor) and aerobic biofilm reactor.
    Kwon JC; Park HS; An JY; Shim KB; Kim YH; Shin HS
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):443-51. PubMed ID: 16459820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater using an activated sludge/contact aeration process.
    Chen CK; Lo SL
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):285-92. PubMed ID: 12926700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of sea water flushing on biological nitrification-denitrification activated sludge sewage treatment process.
    Yu SM; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF; Eckenfelder WW
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):209-16. PubMed ID: 12523756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of secondary settling tank performance on suspended solids mass balance in activated sludge systems.
    Patziger M; Kainz H; Hunze M; Józsa J
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2415-24. PubMed ID: 22365174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.