These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20371933)

  • 21. Assessment of effluent turbidity in mesophilic and thermophilic activated sludge reactors - origin of effluent colloidal material.
    Vogelaar JC; van Lier JB; Klapwijk B; de Vries MC; Lettinga G
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 59(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 12073140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nitritation performance in membrane-aerated biofilm reactors differs from conventional biofilm systems.
    Lackner S; Terada A; Horn H; Henze M; Smets BF
    Water Res; 2010 Dec; 44(20):6073-84. PubMed ID: 20801477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anaerobic treatment of synthetic medium-strength wastewater using a multistage biofilm reactor.
    Ghaniyari-Benis S; Borja R; Monemian SA; Goodarzi V
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Mar; 100(5):1740-5. PubMed ID: 19000944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Polishing of pretreated dye wastewater using novel sequencing batch reactors.
    Singh KS; LeBlanc MM; Bhattacharyya D
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):407-11. PubMed ID: 18701793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of COD/N ratio and salinity on the performance of sequencing batch reactors.
    Rene ER; Kim SJ; Park HS
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar; 99(4):839-46. PubMed ID: 17383178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Swine waste treatment by self-heating aerobic thermophilic bioreactors.
    Juteau P; Tremblay D; Ould-Moulaye CB; Bisaillon JG; Beaudet R
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 14723922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of temperature and sludge age on COD removal and nitrification in a moving bed sequencing batch biofilm reactor.
    Dulkadiroglu H; Cokgor EU; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(11):95-103. PubMed ID: 16114622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the performance of MBBR and SBR systems for the treatment of anaerobic reactor biowaste effluent.
    Comett-Ambriz I; Gonzalez-Martinez S; Wilderer P
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):155-61. PubMed ID: 12926683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor performance with aerated and unaerated FILL periods in treating phenol-containing wastewater.
    Chan CH; Lim PE
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 May; 98(7):1333-8. PubMed ID: 16822665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Carbon membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for synthetic wastewater treatment.
    Liu H; Yang F; Wang T; Liu Q; Hu S
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Jul; 30(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 17318640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of pilot-scale membrane aerated biofilm reactors integrated with anoxic nano-biotechnological reactor for domestic wastewater treatment.
    Thant KJW; Anh-Vu N; Yun-Je K; Masumi K; Visvanathan C
    Chemosphere; 2023 Apr; 319():137927. PubMed ID: 36716932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating papermill wastewater.
    Yilmaz T; Yuceer A; Basibuyuk M
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 17223557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biohydrogen production from chemical wastewater treatment in biofilm configured reactor operated in periodic discontinuous batch mode by selectively enriched anaerobic mixed consortia.
    Venkata Mohan S; Vijaya Bhaskar Y; Sarma PN
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2652-64. PubMed ID: 17418367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of temperature and dissolved oxygen on sludge properties and their role in bioflocculation and settling.
    Liao BQ; Lin HJ; Langevin SP; Gao WJ; Leppard GG
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):509-20. PubMed ID: 20875910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nutrient removal from low strength domestic wastewater in sequencing batch biofilm reactor.
    Altinbas U
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 11496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anaerobic treatment for C and S removal in "zero-discharge" paper mills: effects of process design on S removal efficiencies.
    van Lier JB; Lens PN; Pol LW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 11575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low-biodegradable composite chemical wastewater treatment by biofilm configured sequencing batch reactor (SBBR).
    Mohan SV; Rao NC; Sarma PN
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 144(1-2):108-17. PubMed ID: 17097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modelling and simulation revealing mechanisms likely responsible for achieving the nitrite pathway through aeration control.
    Guisasola A; Marcelino M; Lemaire R; Baeza JA; Yuan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1459-65. PubMed ID: 20351425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Autotrophic nitrogen removal in sequencing batch biofilm reactors at different oxygen supply modes.
    Wantawin C; Juateea J; Noophan PL; Munakata-Marr J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):1889-94. PubMed ID: 19039166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surface modification of PVDF hollow fiber membrane and its application in membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR).
    Hou F; Li B; Xing M; Wang Q; Hu L; Wang S
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 140():1-9. PubMed ID: 23669097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.