181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20373214)
1. Counter propagation artificial neural network categorical models for prediction of carcinogenicity for non-congeneric chemicals.
Fjodorova N; Vracko M; Jezierska A; Novic M
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 20373214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP ANN method for regulatory uses.
Fjodorova N; Vračko M; Tušar M; Jezierska A; Novič M; Kühne R; Schüürmann G
Mol Divers; 2010 Aug; 14(3):581-94. PubMed ID: 19685274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity.
Fjodorova N; Vracko M; Novic M; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
Chem Cent J; 2010 Jul; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 20678182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for predicting and profiling the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
Mombelli E; Devillers J
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):731-52. PubMed ID: 21120759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of criteria used to access carcinogenicity in CPANN QSAR models versus the knowledge-based expert system Toxtree.
Fjodorova N; Novič M
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(6):423-41. PubMed ID: 24716754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: a novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology.
Benigni R; Bossa C
Mutat Res; 2008; 659(3):248-61. PubMed ID: 18621573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The expanding role of predictive toxicology: an update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens.
Benigni R; Netzeva TI; Benfenati E; Bossa C; Franke R; Helma C; Hulzebos E; Marchant C; Richard A; Woo YT; Yang C
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2007; 25(1):53-97. PubMed ID: 17365342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some findings relevant to the mechanistic interpretation in the case of predictive models for carcinogenicity based on the counter propagation artificial neural network.
Fjodorova N; Novič M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1159-69. PubMed ID: 22139476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the applicability domain in the case of classification predictive models for carcinogenicity based on the counter propagation artificial neural network.
Fjodorova N; Novič M; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1147-58. PubMed ID: 22139475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity.
Benigni R
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Mar; 23(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15149144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.
Liu H; Papa E; Walker JD; Gramatica P
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines.
Kar S; Roy K
Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting carcinogenicity of diverse chemicals using probabilistic neural network modeling approaches.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Rai P
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):465-75. PubMed ID: 23856075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anticancer activity of selected phenolic compounds: QSAR studies using ridge regression and neural networks.
Nandi S; Vracko M; Bagchi MC
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):424-36. PubMed ID: 17949360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.
Valerio LG
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
