These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20373228)

  • 1. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The costs of supervised classification: The effect of learning task on conceptual flexibility.
    Hoffman AB; Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):319-40. PubMed ID: 20438254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Category representation for classification and feature inference.
    Johansen MK; Kruschke JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1433-58. PubMed ID: 16393056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning and retention through predictive inference and classification.
    Sakamoto Y; Love BC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):361-77. PubMed ID: 21198253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of feature training on the formation of exemplar-specific representations in children with mental retardation.
    Rosenquist C
    Am J Ment Retard; 2000 Jan; 105(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 10683708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories.
    Griffiths O; Hayes BK; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):576-95. PubMed ID: 22060277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based versus exemplar-based strategies in preschoolers' category learning.
    Krascum RM; Andrews S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 8366324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A further investigation of category learning by inference.
    Anderson AL; Ross BH; Chin-Parker S
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 11958345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Category-use effects in children.
    Hayes BK; Younger K
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(6):1719-32. PubMed ID: 15566375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature distribution and background knowledge in category learning.
    Murphy GL; Kaplan AS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):962-82. PubMed ID: 11131823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
    Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.
    Kloos H; Sloutsky VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):52-72. PubMed ID: 18248129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
    Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the Rey Visual Design Learning Test in primary and secondary school children.
    Wilhelm P; Van Klink M
    Child Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 13(1):86-98. PubMed ID: 17364565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
    Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.
    Yamauchi T; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 10714140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.