These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20373897)

  • 1. Specificity of the program threshold noiseless trend for perimetric progression analysis.
    de la Rosa MG; Diaz-Aleman T; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Jerez-Fidalgo M
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Apr; 35(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 20373897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
    Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual field changes after laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic eyes.
    Ozdamar A; Küçüksümer Y; Aras C; Akova N; Ustundag C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):1020-3. PubMed ID: 15130638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keratometry, optic disc dimensions, and degree and progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
    Jonas JB; Stroux A; Martus P; Budde W
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 16778642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
    Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.