268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20374781)
1. Production systems--an example from Brazil.
Ferraz JB; Felício PE
Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 20374781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic values for production and functional traits and assessment of their influence on genetic improvement in the Boran cattle in Kenya.
Rewe TO; Indetie D; Ojango JM; Kahi AK
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Feb; 123(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16420262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs.
Berthiaume R; Mandell I; Faucitano L; Lafrenière C
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2168-77. PubMed ID: 16864879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sanitary conditions for the production of beef cattle in Argentina].
Lasta JA; Rearte D
Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 9501350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensive sheep and beef production from pasture--a New Zealand perspective of concerns, opportunities and challenges.
Morris ST; Kenyon PR
Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 24998778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today.
Garrick DJ; Golden BL
J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E11-8. PubMed ID: 18849385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brazilian beef produced on pastures: sustainable and healthy.
Lobato JF; Freitas AK; Devincenzi T; Cardoso LL; Tarouco JU; Vieira RM; Dillenburg DR; Castro I
Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 25017318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constraints under organic farming on French sheepmeat production: a legal and economic point of view with an emphasis on farming systems and veterinary aspects.
Benoit M; Laignel G
Vet Res; 2002; 33(5):613-24. PubMed ID: 12387493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems: a perspective from Australia and Brazil.
Berndt A; Tomkins NW
Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():363-72. PubMed ID: 23739477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.
Capper JL; Hayes DJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3527-37. PubMed ID: 22665660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beef symposium: the evolution of beef cattle genetic evaluation.
Bullock KD; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E1-2. PubMed ID: 19151152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Animal production systems in the industrialised world.
Sørensen JT; Edwards S; Noordhuizen J; Gunnarsson S
Rev Sci Tech; 2006 Aug; 25(2):493-503. PubMed ID: 17094692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the efficiency of alternative two-tier nucleus breeding systems designed to improve meat sheep in Kenya.
Gicheha MG; Kosgey IS; Bebe BO; Kahi AK
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 16882091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork.
Bonneau M; Lebret B
Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 20374788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The support of meat value chains by genetic technologies.
Sosnicki AA; Newman S
Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20510526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability.
Faucitano L; Chouinard PY; Fortin J; Mandell IB; Lafrenière C; Girard CL; Berthiaume R
J Anim Sci; 2008 Jul; 86(7):1678-89. PubMed ID: 18375659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of feeding systems on omega-3 fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and trans fatty acids in Australian beef cuts: potential impact on human health.
Ponnampalam EN; Mann NJ; Sinclair AJ
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2006; 15(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16500874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Authentication of beef production systems using a metabolomic-based approach.
Osorio MT; Moloney AP; Brennan L; Monahan FJ
Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 22436164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
