These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20374781)

  • 1. Production systems--an example from Brazil.
    Ferraz JB; Felício PE
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 20374781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic values for production and functional traits and assessment of their influence on genetic improvement in the Boran cattle in Kenya.
    Rewe TO; Indetie D; Ojango JM; Kahi AK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Feb; 123(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16420262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs.
    Berthiaume R; Mandell I; Faucitano L; Lafrenière C
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2168-77. PubMed ID: 16864879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Sanitary conditions for the production of beef cattle in Argentina].
    Lasta JA; Rearte D
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 9501350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensive sheep and beef production from pasture--a New Zealand perspective of concerns, opportunities and challenges.
    Morris ST; Kenyon PR
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 24998778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
    Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today.
    Garrick DJ; Golden BL
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E11-8. PubMed ID: 18849385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brazilian beef produced on pastures: sustainable and healthy.
    Lobato JF; Freitas AK; Devincenzi T; Cardoso LL; Tarouco JU; Vieira RM; Dillenburg DR; Castro I
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 25017318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constraints under organic farming on French sheepmeat production: a legal and economic point of view with an emphasis on farming systems and veterinary aspects.
    Benoit M; Laignel G
    Vet Res; 2002; 33(5):613-24. PubMed ID: 12387493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems: a perspective from Australia and Brazil.
    Berndt A; Tomkins NW
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():363-72. PubMed ID: 23739477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.
    Capper JL; Hayes DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3527-37. PubMed ID: 22665660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beef symposium: the evolution of beef cattle genetic evaluation.
    Bullock KD; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E1-2. PubMed ID: 19151152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Animal production systems in the industrialised world.
    Sørensen JT; Edwards S; Noordhuizen J; Gunnarsson S
    Rev Sci Tech; 2006 Aug; 25(2):493-503. PubMed ID: 17094692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the efficiency of alternative two-tier nucleus breeding systems designed to improve meat sheep in Kenya.
    Gicheha MG; Kosgey IS; Bebe BO; Kahi AK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 16882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork.
    Bonneau M; Lebret B
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 20374788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The support of meat value chains by genetic technologies.
    Sosnicki AA; Newman S
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20510526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability.
    Faucitano L; Chouinard PY; Fortin J; Mandell IB; Lafrenière C; Girard CL; Berthiaume R
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jul; 86(7):1678-89. PubMed ID: 18375659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of feeding systems on omega-3 fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and trans fatty acids in Australian beef cuts: potential impact on human health.
    Ponnampalam EN; Mann NJ; Sinclair AJ
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2006; 15(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16500874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Authentication of beef production systems using a metabolomic-based approach.
    Osorio MT; Moloney AP; Brennan L; Monahan FJ
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 22436164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.