These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20374781)

  • 41. Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation.
    Golden BL; Garrick DJ; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E3-10. PubMed ID: 19028854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of subsidy regimes on economic values of functional traits in beef cattle breeding.
    Wolfová M; Pribyl J; Wolf J; Zahrádková R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Apr; 123(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 16533363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Validation of commercial DNA tests for quantitative beef quality traits.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Li J; Thallman RM; Quaas RL; Dikeman ME; Gill CA; Franke DE; Thomas MG
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):891-900. PubMed ID: 17178813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Meeting the requirements of importing countries: practice and policy for on-farm approaches to food safety.
    Dagg PJ; Butler RJ; Murray JG; Biddle RR
    Rev Sci Tech; 2006 Aug; 25(2):685-700. PubMed ID: 17094706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of calving seasons and marketing strategies in Northern Great Plains beef enterprises. II. Retained ownership systems.
    Reisenauer Leesburg VL; Tess MW; Griffith D
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2322-9. PubMed ID: 17504949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Serological survey of bovine brucellosis in barka and arado breeds (Bos indicus) of western Tigray, Ethiopia.
    Haileselassie Mekonnen ; Shewit Kalayou ; Moses Kyule
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Apr; 94(1-2):28-35. PubMed ID: 20034690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. ASAS Centennial Paper: Impact of animal science research on United States goat production and predictions for the future.
    Sahlu T; Dawson LJ; Gipson TA; Hart SP; Merkel RC; Puchala R; Wang Z; Zeng S; Goetsch AL
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):400-18. PubMed ID: 18791137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle and other ruminants.
    Diskin MG; Morris DG
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Jul; 43 Suppl 2():260-7. PubMed ID: 18638133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.
    Capper JL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):4249-61. PubMed ID: 21803973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Strategies to reduce methane emissions from farmed ruminants grazing on pasture.
    Buddle BM; Denis M; Attwood GT; Altermann E; Janssen PH; Ronimus RS; Pinares-Patiño CS; Muetzel S; Neil Wedlock D
    Vet J; 2011 Apr; 188(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 20347354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Economic dimension and environmental impact of beef production in France].
    Peyraud JL
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2011 Nov; 195(8):1813-24; discussion 1824-5. PubMed ID: 22844743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
    García-Torres S; López-Gajardo A; Mesías FJ
    Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of feeding systems: feed cost, palatability and environmental impact among hay-fattened beef, consistent grass-only-fed beef and conventional marbled beef in Wagyu (Japanese Black cattle).
    Sithyphone K; Yabe M; Horita H; Hayashi K; Fumita T; Shiotsuka Y; Etoh T; Ebara F; Samadmanivong O; Wegner J; Gotoh T
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 21729217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Contribution of Beef to Human Health: A Review of the Role of the Animal Production Systems.
    Pighin D; Pazos A; Chamorro V; Paschetta F; Cunzolo S; Godoy F; Messina V; Pordomingo A; Grigioni G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2016; 2016():8681491. PubMed ID: 26989765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Beef symposium: population data analyses to evaluate trends in animal production systems.
    DiCostanzo A
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E1-2. PubMed ID: 20348373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Eating beef: cattle, methane and food production.
    Wahlquist ÅK
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2013; 22(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 23353606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
    Risius A; Hamm U
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A bioeconomic approach to derive economic values for pasture-based sheep genetic improvement programs.
    Conington J; Bishop SC; Waterhouse A; Simm G
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1290-304. PubMed ID: 15144068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impacts of reproductive technologies on beef production in South America.
    Vasconcelos JL; de Sá Filho OG; Cooke RF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 752():161-80. PubMed ID: 24170359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An overview of the nutritional value of beef and lamb meat from South America.
    Cabrera MC; Saadoun A
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 25042240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.