These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20374892)

  • 1. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
    Pringle TD; Williams SE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.
    Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):767-94. PubMed ID: 19820040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
    McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ractopamine treatment biases in the prediction of pork carcass composition.
    Schinckel AP; Herr CT; Richert BT; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 12597368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
    Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of carcass composition, ham and foreleg weights, and lean meat yields of Iberian pigs using ultrasound measurements in live animals.
    Ayuso D; González A; Hernández F; Corral JM; Izquierdo M
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1884-92. PubMed ID: 23408817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of saleable meat yield using objective measurements captured by video image analysis technology.
    McEvers TJ; Hutcheson JP; Lawrence TE
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3294-300. PubMed ID: 22966082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the impact of errors in the measurement of backfat depth on the prediction of fat-free lean mass.
    Schinckel AP; Einstein ME; Foster K; Craig BA
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Aug; 85(8):2031-42. PubMed ID: 17431039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of sex and slaughter weight on growth performance and carcass traits of pigs intended for dry-cured ham from Teruel (Spain).
    Latorre MA; García-Belenguer E; Ariño L
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Aug; 86(8):1933-42. PubMed ID: 18441085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phenotypic measurements and various indices of lean and fat tissue development in barrows and gilts of two genetic lines from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight.
    Wiseman TG; Mahan DC; Moeller SJ; Peters JC; Fastinger ND; Ching S; Kim YY
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1816-24. PubMed ID: 17400970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of carcass and body fat compositions of grazing crossbred bulls using body measurements.
    Fernandes HJ; Tedeschi LO; Paulino MF; Paiva LM
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(4):1442-53. PubMed ID: 19933431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Growth, development, and carcass composition in five genotypes of swine.
    Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1719-29. PubMed ID: 1634396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Composition analysis of pork carcasses by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG; Evock-Clover CM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Aug; 76(8):2104-14. PubMed ID: 9734860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tissue weights and body composition of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight.
    Wiseman TG; Mahan DC; Peters JC; Fastinger ND; Ching S; Kim YY
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1825-35. PubMed ID: 17400965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: II. Ninth-tenth-eleventh-rib composition, muscle color, and palatability.
    Duckett SK; Neel JP; Sonon RN; Fontenot JP; Clapham WM; Scaglia G
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2691-8. PubMed ID: 17644782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Gruand J; Caritez JC; Billon Y; Guillouet P; Lagant H; Noblet J; Sellier P
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3182-8. PubMed ID: 17785600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.