174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20375374)
21. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required?
Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Addition of shear-wave elastography during second-look MR imaging-directed breast US: effect on lesion detection and biopsy targeting.
Plecha DM; Pham RM; Klein N; Coffey A; Sattar A; Marshall H
Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 24758557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation.
Bayat M; Denis M; Gregory A; Mehrmohammadi M; Kumar V; Meixner D; Fazzio RT; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172801. PubMed ID: 28257467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance.
Shang J; Ruan LT; Wang YY; Zhang XJ; Dang Y; Liu B; Wang WL; Song Y; Chang SJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 Apr; 74(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 30755314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved Breast 2D SWE Algorithm to Eliminate False-Negative Cases.
Barr RG; Engel A; Kim S; Tran P; De Silvestri A
Invest Radiol; 2023 Oct; 58(10):703-709. PubMed ID: 36939607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography - Virtual touch
Dória MT; Jales RM; Conz L; Derchain SFM; Sarian LOZ
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():74-80. PubMed ID: 30927963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ShearWave™ Elastography BE1 multinational breast study: additional SWE™ features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions.
Schäfer FK; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Hahne U; Madjar H; Svensson WE; Balu-Maestro C; Juhan V; Athanasiou A; Mundinger A; Order B; Locatelli M; Cosgrove D; Wolf OJ; Henry JP; Moutfi M; Gay JM; Cohen-Bacrie C
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 23709241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Elastography ultrasound and questionable breast lesions: does it count?
Mansour SM; Omar OS
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3234-44. PubMed ID: 22591761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Hao SY; Ou B; Li LJ; Peng YL; Wang Y; Liu LS; Xiao Y; Liu SJ; Wu CJ; Jiang YX; Parajuly SS; Xu P; Hao Y; Li J; Zhi H; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2492-500. PubMed ID: 26349410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Elastography Complements Ultrasound as Principle Modality in Breast Lesion Assessment.
Redling K; Schwab F; Siebert M; Schötzau A; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 27078033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions.
Zhu QL; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Liu H; Sun Q; Dai Q; Chen X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1232-8. PubMed ID: 18359145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.
Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Evaluation of Ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Category 4 Lesions.
Li XL; Xu HX; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Huang X; Li DD; Guo LH; Xu JM; Sun LP; Fang L; Xu XH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2050-7. PubMed ID: 27174418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of strain and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast lesions by qualitative evaluation.
Zhao Q; Wang XL; Sun JW; Jiang ZP; Tao L; Zhou XL
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 29660916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shearwave Elastography Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in Characterization of Breast Lesions.
Ng WL; Rahmat K; Fadzli F; Rozalli FI; Mohd-Shah MN; Chandran PA; Westerhout CJ; Vijayananthan A; Abdul Aziz YF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(12):e3146. PubMed ID: 27015196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results.
Navarro B; Ubeda B; Vallespí M; Wolf C; Casas L; Browne JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21357553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
