325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20375396)
1. Gene patenting--is the pendulum swinging back?
Kesselheim AS; Mello MM
N Engl J Med; 2010 May; 362(20):1855-8. PubMed ID: 20375396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court will rule on whether patents for BRAC1 and BRAC2 genes are valid.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8266. PubMed ID: 23223689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US Supreme Court is asked to rule on validity of patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6624. PubMed ID: 23033368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court ruling broadens BRCA testing options.
Azvolinsky A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Nov; 105(22):1671-2. PubMed ID: 24198329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Intellectual property. In a flurry of metaphors, justices debate a limit on gene patents.
Marshall E
Science; 2013 Apr; 340(6131):421. PubMed ID: 23620028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Revocation of the BRCA1 patents by the European Office of Patents: a victory over a rights abuse].
Stoppa-Lyonnet D; Lenoir G
Bull Cancer; 2005 Apr; 92(4):410-1. PubMed ID: 15888396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Federal judge and government of the United States against gene patenting].
Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D
Med Sci (Paris); 2011; 27(6-7):662-6. PubMed ID: 21718652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene patenting--the Supreme Court finally speaks.
Kesselheim AS; Cook-Deegan RM; Winickoff DE; Mello MM
N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(9):869-75. PubMed ID: 23841703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Your money or your life.
Westphal SP
New Sci; 2002 Jul; 175(2351):28-33. PubMed ID: 12625339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patents on breast cancer genes are illegal and stymie research, say scientists.
Lenzer J
BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b4899. PubMed ID: 19920010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Property rights.
Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7237):385. PubMed ID: 19325578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Supreme Court free genes - economic and legal justifications - impacts on innovation and the healthcare offer].
Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D
Med Sci (Paris); 2015 Feb; 31(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 25744269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who owns human genes?: Is DNA patentable?
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2013 Aug; 310(8):791-2. PubMed ID: 23877839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic patent singles out Jewish women.
Abbott A
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):12. PubMed ID: 16001030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Malta provides loophole for breast-cancer screen.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):767. PubMed ID: 12397316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US Supreme Court hears arguments in case of BRCA1 and BRCA2 [corrected] patents.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2446. PubMed ID: 23596230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ACLU lawsuit questions the patenting of breast cancer genes.
Printz C
Cancer; 2009 Nov; 115(21):4887-8. PubMed ID: 19842208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Europe to pay royalties for cancer gene.
Abbott A
Nature; 2008 Dec; 456(7222):556. PubMed ID: 19052591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Data disclosure crucial after DNA patent verdict.
de Costa A
Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6149):959. PubMed ID: 23990544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The double-helix derailed: the story of the BRCA patent.
Matloff ET; Brierley KL
Lancet; 2010 Jul; 376(9738):314-5. PubMed ID: 20674708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
