BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20375418)

  • 1. Predicting the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D index from CDC's "Healthy Days" in a US sample.
    Jia H; Zack MM; Moriarty DG; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):174-85. PubMed ID: 20375418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating EuroQol EQ-5D scores from Population Healthy Days data.
    Jia H; Lubetkin EI
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 18556640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.
    Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.
    McCaffrey N; Kaambwa B; Currow DC; Ratcliffe J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):133. PubMed ID: 27644755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.
    Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
    Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample.
    Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan V
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 16855128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference-Based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States.
    Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan V
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):410-20. PubMed ID: 16855129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does quality of life of COPD patients as measured by the generic EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire differentiate between COPD severity stages?
    Rutten-van Mölken MP; Oostenbrink JB; Tashkin DP; Burkhart D; Monz BU
    Chest; 2006 Oct; 130(4):1117-28. PubMed ID: 17035446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in mental health interventions: mapping mental health specific outcome measure GHQ-12 onto EQ-5D-3L.
    Lindkvist M; Feldman I
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):134. PubMed ID: 27644119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.
    Kontodimopoulos N; Aletras VH; Paliouras D; Niakas D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19558372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
    Petrou S; Hockley C
    Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Wong CKH; Cheung PWH; Samartzis D; Luk KD; Cheung KMC; Lam CLK; Cheung JPY
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175847. PubMed ID: 28414745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping ALSFRS-R and ALSUI to EQ-5D in Patients with Motor Neuron Disease.
    Moore A; Young CA; Hughes DA
    Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 30442280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping PROMIS Global Health Items to EuroQol (EQ-5D) Utility Scores Using Linear and Equipercentile Equating.
    Thompson NR; Lapin BR; Katzan IL
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1167-1176. PubMed ID: 28710740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping the English and Chinese versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to the EQ-5D utility index.
    Cheung YB; Thumboo J; Gao F; Ng GY; Pang G; Koo WH; Sethi VK; Wee J; Goh C
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 18783392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EQ-5D health utilities: exploring ways to improve upon responsiveness in psoriasis.
    Pickard AS; Gooderham M; Hartz S; Nicolay C
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jan; 20(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 27471948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice Defines QALYs: A US Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L.
    Craig BM; Rand K
    Med Care; 2018 Jun; 56(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 29668646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 Health Survey in a nationally representative sample.
    Lawrence WF; Fleishman JA
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 15090102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.