These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20375419)
1. A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):661-71. PubMed ID: 20375419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA Cancer; 2008 Dec; 113(12):3382-90. PubMed ID: 19012353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences. Price M; Cameron R; Butow P Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Smith DM; Derry HA; McClure JB; Stark A; Pitsch RK; Fagerlin A Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 18602242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Angott AM; Ubel PA Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 129(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 20945090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Exe NL; Kahn VC; Dickson M J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):e106. PubMed ID: 22832208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17137743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Dickson M; Witteman HO J Med Internet Res; 2011 Aug; 13(3):e60. PubMed ID: 21868349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients-A web-based randomized controlled trial. Kasper J; van de Roemer A; Pöttgen J; Rahn A; Backhus I; Bay Y; Köpke S; Heesen C Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 27981688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy. Williams C; Brunskill S; Altman D; Briggs A; Campbell H; Clarke M; Glanville J; Gray A; Harris A; Johnston K; Lodge M Health Technol Assess; 2006 Sep; 10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. PubMed ID: 16959170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice. Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presenting decision-relevant numerical information to Dutch women aged 50-70 with varying levels of health literacy: Case example of adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. van Strien-Knippenberg IS; Timmermans DRM; Engelhardt EG; Konings IRHM; Damman OC PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0309668. PubMed ID: 39226280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy. Hamstra DA; Johnson SB; Daignault S; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Taylor JM; Larkin K; Wood A; Fagerlin A Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25277673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment. Tait AR; Voepel-Lewis T; Brennan-Martinez C; McGonegal M; Levine R Am J Med; 2012 Nov; 125(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22939094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics. Ancker JS; Weber EU; Kukafka R Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 20671209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions. Ancker JS; Weber EU; Kukafka R Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 20393103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Dickson M; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Kahn VC; Exe NL; Valerio M; Holtzman LG; Scherer LD; Fagerlin A Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 24246564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Men's interpretations of graphical information in a videotape decision aid. Pylar J; Wills CE; Lillie J; Rovner DR; Kelly-Blake K; Holmes-Rovner M Health Expect; 2007 Jun; 10(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 17524011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]