144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20375930)
1. Computer reminders for Chlamydia screening in general practice: a randomized controlled trial.
Walker J; Fairley CK; Walker SM; Gurrin LC; Gunn JM; Pirotta MV; Carter R; Hocking JS
Sex Transm Dis; 2010 Jul; 37(7):445-50. PubMed ID: 20375930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of strategies to increase chlamydia screening in young women.
Scholes D; Grothaus L; McClure J; Reid R; Fishman P; Sisk C; Lindenbaum JE; Green B; Grafton J; Thompson RS
Prev Med; 2006 Oct; 43(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 16782182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients and computers as reminders to screen for diabetes in family practice. Randomized-controlled trial.
Kenealy T; Arroll B; Petrie KJ
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Oct; 20(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 16191138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genital chlamydia in southern New South Wales: an ecological analysis of testing and notification patterns 2004-2008.
Reynolds R; Oakman T
Aust J Rural Health; 2010 Aug; 18(4):159-65. PubMed ID: 20690912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of computerized medical records to determine the feasibility of testing for chlamydia without patients seeing a practitioner.
Yeung A; Bush M; Cummings R; Bradshaw CS; Chen M; Williams H; Denham I; Fairley CK
Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Nov; 21(11):755-7. PubMed ID: 21187357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the impact of a national health demonstration project on testing and management for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in two regions of Scotland.
Penney GC; Brace V; Cameron S; Tucker J
Public Health; 2005 Nov; 119(11):1031-8. PubMed ID: 16084540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is provider continuity associated with chlamydia screening for adolescent and young adult women?
Reid RJ; Scholes D; Grothaus L; Truelove Y; Fishman P; McClure J; Grafton J; Thompson RS
Prev Med; 2005; 41(5-6):865-72. PubMed ID: 16169069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice--a qualitative study.
McNulty CA; Freeman E; Howell-Jones R; Hogan A; Randall S; Ford-Young W; Beckwith P; Oliver I
Fam Pract; 2010 Jun; 27(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 20308246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.
Bilardi JE; Fairley CK; Temple-Smith MJ; Pirotta MV; McNamee KM; Bourke S; Gurrin LC; Hellard M; Sanci LA; Wills MJ; Walker J; Chen MY; Hocking JS
BMC Public Health; 2010 Feb; 10():70. PubMed ID: 20158918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in Chlamydia positivity over time among women in Melbourne Australia, 2003 to 2007.
O'Rourke KM; Fairley CK; Samaranayake A; Collignon P; Hocking JS
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Dec; 36(12):763-7. PubMed ID: 19801964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of computer-based reminders and audit and feedback to improve HIV screening in a primary care setting.
Sundaram V; Lazzeroni LC; Douglass LR; Sanders GD; Tempio P; Owens DK
Int J STD AIDS; 2009 Aug; 20(8):527-33. PubMed ID: 19625582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the detection and response to adherence problems with cardiovascular medication in primary care through computerized drug management systems: a randomized controlled trial.
Tamblyn R; Reidel K; Huang A; Taylor L; Winslade N; Bartlett G; Grad R; Jacques A; Dawes M; Larochelle P; Pinsonneault A
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):176-88. PubMed ID: 19675319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for the effectiveness of a chlamydia awareness campaign: increased population rates of chlamydia testing and detection.
Chen MY; Karvelas M; Sundararajan V; Hocking JS; Fairley CK
Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Apr; 18(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 17509173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Sydney women.
Chen MY; Rohrsheim R; Donovan B
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 16171478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of the general practitioner in testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: an analysis of enhanced surveillance data.
Shaw K; Stephens N; Coleman D; O'Sullivan M
Sex Health; 2009 Sep; 6(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19653957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.
Salisbury C; Macleod J; Egger M; McCarthy A; Patel R; Holloway A; Ibrahim F; Sterne JA; Horner P; Low N
Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Feb; 56(523):99-103. PubMed ID: 16464322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel interventions to reduce re-infection in women with chlamydia: a randomized controlled trial.
Cameron ST; Glasier A; Scott G; Young H; Melvin L; Johnstone A; Elton R
Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):888-95. PubMed ID: 19136481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chlamydia testing and notification in Australia: more money, more tests.
McNamee KM; Fairley CK; Hocking JS
Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Dec; 84(7):565-9; discussion 569. PubMed ID: 18653566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
