BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20376542)

  • 1. Comparing the utility of a modified Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS) with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) as a research screen in college students.
    Fortune EE; Goodie AS
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 20376542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Italian Adolescent Gambling Behaviour: Psychometric Evaluation of the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students.
    Colasante E; Gori M; Bastiani L; Scalese M; Siciliano V; Molinaro S
    J Gambl Stud; 2014 Dec; 30(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 23740346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
    de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
    Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
    Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
    Kido M; Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequent card playing and pathological gambling: the utility of the Georgia Gambling Task and Iowa Gambling Task for predicting pathology.
    Lakey CE; Goodie AS; Campbell WK
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 17171543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling.
    Grant JE; Steinberg MA; Kim SW; Rounsaville BJ; Potenza MN
    Psychiatry Res; 2004 Aug; 128(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 15450917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
    Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
    Boudreau B; Poulin C
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of the pathological gambling adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS).
    Pallanti S; DeCaria CM; Grant JE; Urpe M; Hollander E
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 16311876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Victorian Gambling Screen: reliability and validation in a clinical population.
    Tolchard B; Battersby MW
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 20035440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
    Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: psychometric properties and evidence from cognitive biases.
    Lakey CE; Goodie AS; Lance CE; Stinchfield R; Winters KC
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Dec; 23(4):479-98. PubMed ID: 17453325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
    Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disordered gambling as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: evidence for a common etiologic structure.
    Slutske WS; Zhu G; Meier MH; Martin NG
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2011 Aug; 120(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 21443290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
    Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.
    Lesieur HR; Blume SB
    Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Sep; 144(9):1184-8. PubMed ID: 3631315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: an evaluation of the scale and its accompanying profiler software in a clinical setting.
    Young MM; Wohl MJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Sep; 27(3):467-85. PubMed ID: 20978826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.