These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20376542)

  • 21. Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale.
    Granero R; Jiménez-Murcia S; Fernández-Aranda F; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mena-Moreno T; Mestre-Bach G; Gómez-Peña M; Moragas L; Aymamí N; Giroux I; Grall-Bronnec M; Sauvaget A; Codina E; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Lozano-Madrid M; Camozzi M; Agüera Z; Sánchez-González J; Casalé-Salayet G; Sánchez I; López-González H; Valenciano-Mendoza E; Mora B; Baenas I; Menchón JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233222. PubMed ID: 32428026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of the Gambling Disorder Screening Questionnaire, a self-administered diagnostic questionnaire for gambling disorder based on the DSM-5 criteria.
    Villella C; Pascucci M; de Waure C; Bellomo A; Conte G
    Riv Psichiatr; 2016; 51(5):206-211. PubMed ID: 27869907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
    Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
    Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gambling screens: does shortening the time frame affect their psychometric properties?
    Wulfert E; Hartley J; Lee M; Wang N; Franco C; Sodano R
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):521-36. PubMed ID: 16311880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validating the gambling functional assessment--revised in a United kingdom sample.
    Weatherly JN; Dymond S; Samuels L; Austin JL; Terrell HK
    J Gambl Stud; 2014 Jun; 30(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 23283635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychometric evaluation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index-Chinese version (PGSI-C).
    Loo JM; Oei TP; Raylu N
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Sep; 27(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 20924655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the problem gambling severity index.
    Holtgraves T
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 18704661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.
    Zhou H; Chen JH; Ling H; Tong KK; Wu AMS
    Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605182. PubMed ID: 36466009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The validity and reliability of four measures of gambling behaviour in a sample of Singapore University students.
    Arthur D; Tong WL; Chen CP; Hing AY; Sagara-Rosemeyer M; Kua EH; Ignacio J
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Dec; 24(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 18592358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
    Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
    Hodgins DC
    Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
    Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
    Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Esparza-Reig J; Guillén-Riquelme A; Martí-Vilar M; González-Sala F
    Psicothema; 2021 Aug; 33(3):490-499. PubMed ID: 34297680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers.
    Kuentzel JG; Henderson MJ; Melville CL
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):307-19. PubMed ID: 18369710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The Hungarian version of the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Farkas J; Kun B; Kökönyei G; Eisinger A; Magi A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2013; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 24142293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dimensions of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in Finland: A cross-sectional population study.
    Salonen AH; Rosenström T; Edgren R; Volberg R; Alho H; Castrén S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Jun; 58(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 28247931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the reliability of the Gambling Functional Assessment: Revised.
    Weatherly JN; Miller JC; Montes KS; Rost C
    J Gambl Stud; 2012 Jun; 28(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 21979489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The South Oaks Gambling Screen: a review with reference to Australian use.
    Battersby MW; Thomas LJ; Tolchard B; Esterman A
    J Gambl Stud; 2002; 18(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12375383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.