These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2037671)

  • 1. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Culver DH; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 2037671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and automated Vitek methods for testing susceptibilities of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin.
    Kohner PC; Patel R; Uhl JR; Garin KM; Hopkins MK; Wegener LT; Cockerill FR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3258-63. PubMed ID: 9399530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of five methods, including the PDM Epsilometer test (E test), for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Joyce LF; Downes J; Stockman K; Andrew JH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Oct; 30(10):2709-13. PubMed ID: 1400972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for testing activity of cefditoren against Streptococcus pneumoniae.
    Kelly LM; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Oct; 37(10):3296-9. PubMed ID: 10488195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori. Comparison of E-test, broth microdilution, and disk diffusion for ampicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole.
    Hachem CY; Clarridge JE; Reddy R; Flamm R; Evans DG; Tanaka SK; Graham DY
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Jan; 24(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 8988762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activity of retapamulin against Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus evaluated by agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methodologies.
    Pankuch GA; Lin G; Hoellman DB; Good CE; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2006 May; 50(5):1727-30. PubMed ID: 16641442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains.
    Lo-Ten-Foe JR; de Smet AM; Diederen BM; Kluytmans JA; van Keulen PH
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of ramoplanin MICs.
    Kenny MT; Brackman MA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1364-5. PubMed ID: 8051270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a commercial microdilution system for quantitative susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides against multidrug-resistant, gram-negative bacilli.
    Peterson LR; Gerding DN; Johnson MM; Cherne JE; Opfer BJ; Hall WH
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Jan; 17(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 7352748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the E test, agar dilution, and broth microdilution for testing susceptibilities of Helicobacter pylori strains to 20 antimicrobial agents.
    Piccolomini R; Di Bonaventura G; Catamo G; Carbone F; Neri M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(7):1842-6. PubMed ID: 9196205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Etest, agar dilution, broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for testing in vitro activity of levofloxacin against Staphylococcus spp. isolated from neutropenic cancer patients.
    Di Bonaventura G; D'Antonio D; Catamo G; Ballone E; Piccolomini R
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2002 Feb; 19(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11850168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Citron DM; Ostovari MI; Karlsson A; Goldstein EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2197-203. PubMed ID: 1939571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli by Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, and Gradient Strip Methods Compared with Broth Microdilution.
    Hakvoort H; Bovenkamp E; Greenwood-Quaintance KE; Schmidt-Malan SM; Mandrekar JN; Schuetz AN; Patel R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 32727832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to broth microdilution for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Steward CD; Stocker SA; Swenson JM; O'Hara CM; Edwards JR; Gaynes RP; McGowan JE; Tenover FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):544-7. PubMed ID: 9986809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of broth microdilution, E Test, and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.
    Luber P; Bartelt E; Genschow E; Wagner J; Hahn H
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 41(3):1062-8. PubMed ID: 12624030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, disk diffusion, E-test, and BACTEC radiometric methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of the Nocardia asteroides complex.
    Ambaye A; Kohner PC; Wollan PC; Roberts KL; Roberts GD; Cockerill FR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Apr; 35(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 9157140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antimicrobial activity of SCH27899 (Ziracin), a novel everninomicin derivative, tested against Streptococcus spp.: disk diffusion/etest method evaluations and quality control guidelines. The Quality Control Study Group.
    Marshall SA; Jones RN; Erwin ME
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Jan; 33(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9990471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques for anaerobic susceptibility testing.
    Thornsberry C
    J Infect Dis; 1977 Mar; 135 Suppl():S4-6. PubMed ID: 850089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.
    Staneck JL; Glenn S; DiPersio JR; Leist PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 2511223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents.
    Huang MB; Baker CN; Banerjee S; Tenover FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Dec; 30(12):3243-8. PubMed ID: 1452709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.