These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20376760)

  • 1. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
    Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion.
    Amuwa C; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image-based hip navigation.
    Wentzensen A; Zheng G; Vock B; Langlotz U; Korber J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA
    Int Orthop; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 14565684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion.
    Chang JD; Kim IS; Prabhakar S; Mansukhani SA; Lee SS; Yoo JH
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1576-1580. PubMed ID: 28139342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted total hip navigation.
    Wixson RL
    Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():707-20. PubMed ID: 18399618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament for acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: an analysis of acetabular component position and range of movement using navigation software.
    Kalteis T; Sendtner E; Beverland D; Archbold PA; Hube R; Schuster T; Renkawitz T; Grifka J
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21768623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience.
    Grützner PA; Zheng G; Langlotz U; von Recum J; Nolte LP; Wentzensen A; Widmer KH; Wendl K
    Injury; 2004 Jun; 35 Suppl 1():S-A90-5. PubMed ID: 15183709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?
    Kalteis T; Handel M; Bäthis H; Perlick L; Tingart M; Grifka J
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 16434517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
    Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Hube R; Birke A; Hein W; Klima S
    Surg Technol Int; 2003; 11():275-80. PubMed ID: 12931311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: a prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements.
    Reikerås O; Gunderson RB
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Oct; 97(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 21889919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.