These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20377294)

  • 1. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.
    Lesmes LA; Lu ZL; Baek J; Albright TD
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):17.1-21. PubMed ID: 20377294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method.
    Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia.
    Hou F; Huang CB; Lesmes L; Feng LX; Tao L; Zhou YF; Lu ZL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Oct; 51(10):5365-77. PubMed ID: 20484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.
    Hou F; Lesmes L; Bex P; Dorr M; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):2. PubMed ID: 26161631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing spatial vision - automated measurement of the contrast-sensitivity function in the hooded rat.
    Keller J; Strasburger H; Cerutti DT; Sabel BA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Apr; 97(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 10788664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient Characterization and Classification of Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Aging.
    Yan FF; Hou F; Lu ZL; Hu X; Huang CB
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5045. PubMed ID: 28698553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quick contrast sensitivity measurements in the periphery.
    Rosén R; Lundström L; Venkataraman AP; Winter S; Unsbo P
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):3. PubMed ID: 24993017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two contrast adaptation processes: contrast normalization and shifting, rectifying contrast comparison.
    Wolfson SS; Graham N
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):30.1-23. PubMed ID: 19757939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship of Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using Quick Contrast Sensitivity Function With Other Visual Functions in a Low Vision Population.
    Stalin A; Dalton K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 61(6):21. PubMed ID: 32516407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of contrast sensitivity functions in a within-subject design.
    Zhao Y; Lesmes LA; Hou F; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2021 Nov; 21(12):9. PubMed ID: 34792537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method.
    Anderson AJ
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12536138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A normative dataset on human global stereopsis using the quick Disparity Sensitivity Function (qDSF).
    Reynaud A; Gao Y; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):97-103. PubMed ID: 26028556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treated amblyopes remain deficient in spatial vision: a contrast sensitivity and external noise study.
    Huang C; Tao L; Zhou Y; Lu ZL
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 17098275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New Precision Metrics for Contrast Sensitivity Testing.
    Dorr M; Elze T; Wang H; Lu ZL; Bex PJ; Lesmes LA
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 May; 22(3):919-925. PubMed ID: 28650831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity measured with transient VEP: comparison with psychophysics and evidence of multiple mechanisms.
    Souza GS; Gomes BD; Saito CA; da Silva Filho M; Silveira LC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3396-404. PubMed ID: 17591914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-monotonic changes in performance with eccentricity modeled by multiple eccentricity-dependent limitations.
    Poirier FJ; Gurnsey R
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2436-48. PubMed ID: 15979465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Computer-Adaptive Contrast Sensitivity as a Tool to Assess Visual Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.
    Rosenkranz SC; Kaulen B; Zimmermann HG; Bittner AK; Dorr M; Stellmann JP
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():591302. PubMed ID: 33708068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes.
    Hou F; Lesmes LA; Kim W; Gu H; Pitt MA; Myung JI; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2016; 16(6):18. PubMed ID: 27120074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.